Skip to main content

U.S. employers hired at the slowest pace in nearly a year, with steep job cuts in the retail and government sectors, including 12,000 at the U.S. Postal Service.

The labor-force participation rate --- the percentage of people eligible to be working and/or are still looking for work --- fell to 63.3 percent, the lowest level since 1979 (when the middle-class in America was at its peak).

But even still, the reported unemployment rate recently fell from 7.7% to 7.6% --- that's because, the government said 496,000 people "left the labor force completely".

That's like Bill O'Reilly on Fox News saying millions of Americans left their jobs to go on Social Security disability.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that almost another ½ million more Americans are now "discouraged workers" and claim they are no longer looking for work --- and so therefore, are no longer counted in the official (U-3) unemployment rate.

I have estimated that there are close to almost 8 million Americans who "left" the labor force since the beginning of the recession. That's about the same number of jobs that were lost from December 2007 to October 2009 due to mass layoffs (attributed to cutbacks, down-sizing, automation and outsourcing.)

The roughly 6 million net new jobs created since the recession ended is about the same number of high school and college graduates we've had during that same period of time.

So job growth has barely been keeping pace with natural population growth, and the unemployment situation is almost exactly the same now as it was in October 2009 --- when the unemployment rate was at 10.2% with 15.9 million reported unemployed (only now, millions more just aren't are being counted any longer.)

I have also estimated that approximately 8 million Americans or more have already exhausted 99 weeks (or less) of unemployment benefits over 2 years ago --- and like myself, still remain both unemployed and not counted in ANY measure of unemployment by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (in the U-6 rate or otherwise).

That would also help account for a rise is Social Security disability applications (just "claims", not actual "awards"), both because of an aging population AND because of the continued high unemployment situation --- and why so many older unemployed workers were forced to take early Social Security retirements at age 62, instead of at 65 or 67. (Robert Reich currently has a petition saying "NO" to chained CPI on Social Security).

The rise in the REAL number of Americans who are without jobs or any other form of income would also help account for the rise in other "entitlements" as well, such as food stamps and Medicaid. If you can't find a job, just because you wish to eat and receive healthcare, it doesn't necessarily mean one is too lazy to work if fewer and fewer full-time jobs that pay a "living wage" are unavailable.

And if you don't have the financial means to pack up your personal possessions and drive across the country from California to New York to get apply for that job at McDonald's that you might quality for, it doesn't necessarily mean you're refusing work --- and also because, many (like myself) have already lost their cars.

According to the  Bureau of Labor Statistics (as of March 2013) 142.7 million Americans are now in the work force. If this is true, then we might also see a drop in the number of federal tax returns filed with the IRS for FY2012 (see chart below).

Of 142.7 million in the work force, 113.9 million are full-time and 27.5 million are part-time --- and of those, 7 million are multiple job holders --- while 8.8 million disabled workers received SSDI --- and NOT 14 million as Fox News reports.

According to the Social Security Administration, half of all U.S. wage earners earned $26,965 a year or LESS after taxes for a "median" annual net income --- meaning half earned more and half earned less. The annual "household income" (before taxes) is now $51,404.

According to, H-1B, TN-1, J-1 and E-3 VISA eligible occupations have seen a distinct upward trend. Are H-1B workers also included in the labor participation rate? I ask because according to Robert Cringely, after annual quotas are met, many of these VISAs are extended --- so at any moment there are about 700,000 H-1B visa holders working in the USA. (Also see H-1B Willful Violators List and H-1B Debarred Employers List)

* * HELP - Would someone else care to complete and assess the chart below? After 35 years of being in the labor force, for the past 2 years I am no longer required to file a federal tax return. I'm trying to determine how many more Americans are also exempt, by comparing the number of tax returns filed, previous jobs lost, and the net new jobs that were created from January 2008 to the present. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 8.7 million jobs were lost between the start of the recession in December of 2007 and June of 2009. (The years below are linked to original IRS documentation).

        and After the Recession
        Tax Returns Filed With IRS
Fiscal Tax Year # Individual Returns (+/-)        


Jobs Created
2006 138,420,499 n/a n/a n/a
2007 143,030,461 + 4,609,962 n/a n/a
2008 142,350,256 - 680,205 - -
2009 140,532,115 - 1,818,141 - -
2010 142,856,282 + 2,324,167 - -
2011 145,579,530 + 2,723,248 - -
2012 Not Available - - -
Balance/Total - - - -

Note: Non-qualified stock options are not mentioned in this post ;)

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It's about time that someone noticed (4+ / 0-)

    that the "official" unemployment figures are a complete fabrication . . . an intentional fraud.  The whole fucking "recovery" is a lie . . .

    Fake Left, Drive Right . . . not my idea of a Democrat . . .

    by Deward Hastings on Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 03:57:39 PM PDT

  •  Dont use population growth or hi school grads (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Civilian Workforce growth is about 130k per month, about 1.6 million per year. About 1.1% per year.

    AS far as the BLS numbers, you cite the employed number: 142.7 million, workforce is 154 million.

    11.7 million difference.

    154 million times U3 of 7.6% is 11.704.

    U6 of 13.8% yields 21.25 million. And we know U6 doesnt count everyone. Call it 25-26 million.

    ...... Social Security blogathon March 25th thru March 29th. #HandsOffmySS FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 04:25:41 PM PDT

    •  Call it 26 million, as I noted this morning... (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      NoMoreLies, Roger Fox, PrahaPartizan reporting the government's jobs announcement for the month:

      Add up the 11.7 million who are officially unemployed, the 7.6 million underemployed, and the 6.72 million who are not in the labor force but say they want a job, and you have 26 million unemployed and underemployed Americans.
      Of course, then you have those who have been forced to take early retirement and now no longer want a job even though they wanted one before they were laid off and couldn't find any replacement employment, especially for someone in their age bracket. Are they unemployed? I think so. But forced-into-retirement is a tough number to suss out.

      Don't tell me what you believe, show me what you do and I will tell you what you believe.

      by Meteor Blades on Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 06:23:20 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Bud - the BLS does track labor force reduction (0+ / 0-)

    It is part of all the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. Here is the link to the current report released today:

    As you will note just in the month of March the civilian worker force declined by nearly 500,000, more than five times the number of new jobs (88,000).

    Thanks for the note about the options.

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 04:33:35 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site