Skip to main content

NRA's Wayne LaPierre holding two handguns
Careful where you point that!
Earlier today, Mother Jones published a piece debunking the NRA mythology around guns and self-defense. Although gun enthusiasts like to claim that their weapons have prevented millions of crimes, the Violence Policy Center's new report demolishes this notion with data, which Mother Jones has thoughtfully rendered into interactive charts.

The Mother Jones article is worth the read just for the charts, but I'll try to sum up the busted myths here.

For example, justifiable homicide. Compared to criminal homicides using guns, the VPC data shows justifiable homicide with a gun in 2010 was a tiny fraction: 230 of them compared to 8,275 criminal gun-related homicides.

MJ also points out how the gun lobby claims around 2.5 million instances of 'defensive gun use' or self-defense using a gun. The comparison to federal crime data from the Department of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey, in chart form, is downright ridiculous. The federal crime data from 2007-2011 tallies 338,700 uses of guns in self-defense, but if you believe the gun lobby, that number should be 12,500,000 -- more than 36 times as many. Lies, damn lies and statistics, eh?

The comparison for victims of violent crime looks even worse for the NRA.

Guns are used for self defense (both successfully and unsuccessfully) by less than 1 percent of all violent crime victims:
235,700 who used a gun in self-defense, compared to the total number of crime victims, almost 30 million.
Wayne LaPierre being rudely interrupted by reality
A gun enthusiast at this point might despair, that so many instruments of freedom languish in gun safes and on nightstands, gathering dust. Alas, that may not be the case, either. The annual average of guns used in self-defense is 67,600, vs. 232,400 guns that are stolen. So that trusty weapon is about 3 and a half times more likely to get thieved than to be used to carry out a heroic fantasy.

The MJ article concludes with a twist, debunking the NRA's latest push to encourage more gun use among women, and by "use" I suppose I should say they want more women to buy guns.

In another twist on the self-defense argument, the NRA likes to claim that women in particular need guns to guard against bullies and rapists. But crime statistics unearthed by the Violence Policy Center indicate that only about 10 percent of those who shoot people in self defense are women:
In 2010, 205 justifiable homicides by men, 24 for women. Not that this should come as a shock to anyone. But the gun lobby is working hard to extract more dollars for the gun industry from women, and although the data is sketchy, supposedly it's working. So these numbers may well go up...although I'm not sure I would call it an improvement for more people to die, even criminals.
Gun sales to women have risen in concert. In a survey last year by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, 73 percent of gun dealers said the number of female customers had gone up in 2011, as had a majority of retailers surveyed in the two previous years.

Manufacturers have increasingly geared advertising toward women, marketing special firearms models with smaller frames, custom colors (pink is a favorite), and accessories like the “concealed carry” “salmon kiss” leather handbag offered by Cobra Firearms or the leopard shooting gloves and Bullet Rosette jewelry sold by Sweet Shot (“Look cute while you shoot!” is the company’s motto).

Hello Kitty style Kel-Tec PLR16
¿Quien Es Mas Macho?
Well, there was one bright side to that article from the NYT. A woman quoted for it mentions owning a pink gun: “It’s not my favorite color, but I bought it because now my husband never touches it.”

Originally posted to The Tytalan Way on Fri Apr 19, 2013 at 10:42 AM PDT.

Also republished by Shut Down the NRA and Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA).

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    If we cannot make our communities safer with the Congress we have now, we will use every means available to make sure we have a different Congress. – Gabrielle Giffords

    by tytalus on Fri Apr 19, 2013 at 10:42:58 AM PDT

  •  but guns protect us (6+ / 0-)

    from invasion by jihadists or communists or the united nations or something. or preserve our right to be revolutionary or something. or something.

    The cold passion for truth hunts in no pack. -Robinson Jeffers

    by Laurence Lewis on Fri Apr 19, 2013 at 10:56:25 AM PDT

  •  honestly, the VPC has as much credibility as the (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    theatre goon

    NRA or the GOA and after watching them "massage" the data through the years it's a well deserved reputation.....

    The reality on the ground is there is no overwhelming majority in favor of gun control.....The background ck could have passed easily if it hadn't been for Feinsteins bill and the general tenor of the entire conversation.....

    Limit the background ck expansion to the current NICS regulations, beef up state reporting of mental health adjudications etc. and it would have flown through.....Whether the amendment actually created a computerized record or not, there were enough people loudly demanding just that that it made it easy for the NRA/GOA to muddy the situation and rile up the populace....

    Anyone who thinks that the gunnies aren't just as organized and on top of this as the Bloombergs of the world is sadly mistaken.

    Vaya con Dios Don Alejo
    I want to die a slave to principles. Not to men.
    Emiliano Zapata

    by buddabelly on Fri Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11:08 AM PDT

    •  Your lack of evidential support is showing (5+ / 0-)

      Although your responses are predictable, thanks for playing.

      If we cannot make our communities safer with the Congress we have now, we will use every means available to make sure we have a different Congress. – Gabrielle Giffords

      by tytalus on Fri Apr 19, 2013 at 11:15:44 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  The GOA is connected to White Supremacist (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        alain2112, Ralphdog, splashy, koosah

        groups, and you think the VPC is on the same level?

        Come on.

        And just follow the money. The NRA and the GOA make tons of money by shilling for the gun industry. There's no money in fighting against the gun industry. Just as there's no money in fighting against Exxon, Monsanto, Big Pharma, etc. etc.

        It's too bizarre when I read conservatives pushing the idea that environmental groups, gun safety groups, Single Payer supporters, et al, are in the pocket of Big Money. But they seem to totally ignore the obvious: their side of the aisle does EXACTLY what Corporate America wants, and there's a ton of money to be made in the bargain of shilling for Corporate America.

        Including the multi-billion-dollar gun industry.

  •  It's even worse than it looks; stunning percentage (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tytalus, splashy, koosah

    ....of guns ending up in the hands of gang members and criminals originated as perfectly legal 'defensive' firearms that are then stolen in home robberies. Thus the possession of a home arsenal actually becomes what's known as an attractive nuisance; it becomes a magnet for burglary, making the owner much less safe, rather than safer.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site