Skip to main content

After the recent happenings in Boston and Texas, my mind started wandering through the cold-hearted landscape of mainstream media. This is where it landed:

A section of a U.S. city on lockdown during a huge manhunt for criminals suspected of a bombing. SWAT teams searching everywhere and reporters tripping over themselves to get entertainment – uh, I mean information - out to their customers. ANY information – whether true or not. It’s a disconcerting thought in a society that purports to be a democracy. I couldn’t help wondering why that much attention and that many resources aren’t expended on educating the public on the destruction of the U.S. Constitution – something that affects everyone in the U.S. in a big way. Or why stories on the sad state of the less fortunate in society aren’t on the front pages of newspapers and featured on television news programs. I wondered if the corporate media would give so much airtime if Muslims or young Black and Latino men were being murdered. Or, if homeless people were being cut down in the streets.

It’s very sad that we seem to vary the values we place on human life depending on where they fit into society – as if life were a commodity. Oh yeah, that’s right. We live in that heartless system called Capitalism. Everything has value, with a number attached to it. How could I forget? We sell good health to those wealthy enough to afford it. We sell indoctrination and call it media, entertainment and education. People pay for an education and get tamed. Corporate media’s purpose is to soothe the beast of creativity. Obey and you might “succeed”. Observe protocol and climb the corporate ladder.

Since we allow pharmaceutical corporations to get away with mass murder by marketing unsafe drugs and fast “food” establishments to reap billions selling toxin-laden snacks to a mostly unsuspecting populace (especially in poor neighborhoods), do we really care about one another? Or do we like a good story? Would we find the resources to track down criminals preying on “undesirables”? Or are the ratings too low for prime time?

Now, I’m not talking about any specific subject in the media - racism, religious intolerance or poverty – as important as they are. I’m talking about the way that corporate media jumps on the bandwagon of controlling information in a way that keeps attention riveted on certain issues. There are two aspects to this strategy. And, it IS a strategy. Don’t fool yourself that it’s some natural process. One part of the strategy is that it diverts attention from the fact that OUR government has been purchased – at a discount price – by corporations and, specifically, away from the horrible deregulation corporations purchase from corrupt politicians to bypass important legislation designed to protect people. From environmental disasters to manipulation of elections to disposing of safety and fairness regulations, corporate criminals are feasting on the carcass of our former democracy while the working class pay the price.

For example, the corporate media went at the Boston bombing that killed 3 innocent people like rabid mongrels who’d been starved for days. Why was there relatively so little attention paid to the explosion in West, Texas in which at least 15 innocent people were killed (the majority first responders) and over 200 injured? It left a crater 93 feet in diameter and 10 feet deep. Isn’t that entertaining enough, America? Of course, I’m not dismissing the horrible tragedy in Boston. Any time people are senselessly murdered and maimed we need to express the love and compassion necessary to move forward with healing. It’s an extremely painful process that takes time, patience and understanding. I just can’t help being concerned with why we don’t care as much about a PREVENTABLE disaster like an industrial accident as we do about the “disasters” that wealthy people want us to pay attention to. And that brings me to the second aspect of the manipulation of information by corporate media. They spend much more time on the disasters that corporations can profit on instead of the disasters these predators need to show responsibility for. It’s about the money, the driving force behind most of what goes on in this selfish, possession-obsessed world we live in.

Why do we allow this to happen? Why don’t we like to question our masters over their deranged fascination with deregulation? Some people think; ‘Well, what’s wrong with corporations taking care of corporations? They’re people, too, right?’ Is it because we’re too busy worrying about people from other societies “attacking our way of life”? The way of life in which people are thrown away if they are too disabled, too poor or too old? The one in which almost the entirety of society is expected to work most of their lives to provide comfort and luxuries for a few people who rule over them? And then, after decades of paying their due, have to worry that their small, ineffectual safety net is going to be stolen by purchased politicians doing the bidding for those same people? The way of life in which more than 16 MILLION children live in poverty and where about 10,000 people die each year due to gun violence? We’ve all got to do our part to protect this system where human life is a commodity exchanged on the big board Monday through Friday from 9 to 5.

How long will people continue to believe we live in a civilized society? How long will we stay blind to the savagery of a system in which guns are better protected than some people? And, where many disabled are left to fend for themselves. In which some children are forced to go to school without proper nutrition and be relegated to the darker corners of society for not being able to compete with those given what EVERY CHILD NEEDS AND DESERVES. I’m not sure what’s worse – that these things exist or that so many people aren’t aware of it.

Mohandas Gandhi was once asked about “Western civilization”. His reply was “I think it would be an excellent idea.” Unfortunately, things haven’t changed much after all these years in the land of the “me” and the home of the enslaved.


How corrupt is corporate media?

80%8 votes
10%1 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes

| 10 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Ray Pensador

    Honor is not a reward. Trust is not a commodity.

    by ashiftinconsciousness on Thu May 09, 2013 at 01:41:42 PM PDT

  •  the news (0+ / 0-)

    the media does have a clear corporate bias. they are employed by large corporations, and they are located in large corporate cities. they are immersed in a non-ideological, competitive environment and dislike the more socialistic complaints about conservatives being pure ideologues, because they don't see the southeast or plains republican winning by default on the back of the koch brothers. this leads them to color liberal criticisms against the blatantly corporate agenda of the current right wing as heavily biased. on cnn in particular, i see some disturbing, blatantly untrue reporting go unchallenged, particularly on the health care issue. otherwise, most of the media bias like you see on fox or msnbc is just emotional stuff.

    for the disaster stories, you are overestimating how much of it is nefarious and underestimating how much of it is laziness and incompetence. they were bonkers in boston because it was close by and they could get there without spending any money. remember to keep in mind that the reporters you're watching are imbeciles and they're all cutting their budgets a bunch. investigative reporters are being eliminated. they are cutting benefits and not reimbursing travel.

    the tv news should have never been your source of information if it was. it is a product. it is entertainment. your local news reporting from the scene is done in the studio. none of the conversation is natural. the concept of the pure news of the past is BS, it has evolved from a point of much more blatant bias in the past. tv only had three channels, creating a bland oligopoly that resembled balance. now there are more options and yellow journalism can return. soon the blaze will be on cablevision. the tv news basically just aggregates bulletins and leaks from contacts. they don't find the story, they just recieve it (disturbingly, police investigations, especially fbi, are often like this too). any live coverage is just a bonus.

    as far as them putting out information to mold us, i'm more concerned about the brave-new-world level prepondence of mind-numbing fluff than anything else. the extremely fake emotions and unnatural verbiage used in human interest stories forcing us into groupthink. in the brave new world vs. animal farm battle, i think we can fairly say huxley won.

    •  Infotainment (0+ / 0-)

      The slashing of news budgets, questionable prioritizing of stories, slanted editorializing and the hiring of - as you put it - "imbeciles" (Barbie dolls and obnoxious jerks who toe the corporate line) instead of quality investigative journalists are all "nefarious" tactics by corporate media manipulators who blatantly disregard truth and fact in pushing the corporate agenda.
      Television "news" is never my source of information for anything. I merely made an observation and wrote about it.
       The "mind-numbing fluff" is planned misdirection to take our attention away from what matters. It's part of the corporate battle for the minds of the masses. The other part is the editorials and selective stories that are loaded with disingenuous "faction" and emotional triggers that we are expected to swallow like so much kool-aid.

      Doing my part to break the Capitalist Indoctrination Process. Here's where I rant:

      by ashiftinconsciousness on Thu May 09, 2013 at 06:20:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site