Skip to main content

So this has been the big story everyone's talking about:

http://www.pcworld.com/...

Privacy groups and some lawmakers are in an uproar after news reports this week that the U.S. National Security Agency is conducting broad surveillance of the nation’s residents.

British newspaper the Guardian reported Thursday that the NSA, with authorization from the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, has been collecting the phone records of a large number of Verizon customers.

Later that day, the Guardian and the Washington Post reported that the NSA and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation also have access to servers at Google, Facebook, Microsoft and other major providers of Internet services, collecting audio, video, email and other content for surveillance. Some of the companies denied that the NSA and FBI have access to their servers.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported that the NSA is also collecting customer records from AT&T, Sprint Nextel and credit-card companies.

James Clapper, director of national intelligence for President Barack Obama, defended the PRISM program targeting Internet communications. The Guardian and Post articles “contain numerous inaccuracies,” Clapper said in a statement.

The program is authorized by Congress and focuses on “the acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning non-U.S. persons located outside the United States,” Clapper added. “It cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. citizen, any other U.S. person, or anyone located within the United States.”

Information collected under the program is “among the most important and valuable foreign intelligence information we collect, and is used to protect our nation from a wide variety of threats,” Clapper added. “The unauthorized disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans.” - PC World, 6/7/13

Senator Al Franken (D. MN) had this to say about the NSA phone tracking:

http://www.politicususa.com/...

“There’s a balance to strike between protecting Americans’ privacy and protecting our country’s national security. I don’t think we’ve struck that balance. I’m concerned about the lack of transparency of these programs. The American public can’t be kept in the dark about the basic architecture of the programs designed to protect them.

“We need to revisit how we address that balance. I agree with Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) that the relevant significant FISA Court opinions should be made public to the degree possible, consistent with protecting national security.” - Politicus USA, 6/6/13

Franken is echoing his fellow colleagues and critics of the NSA surveillance program:

http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/...

-- Statement from Leslie Harris, president of the Center for Democracy and Technology: "In the face of this avalanche of frightening revelations about the breadth of the NSA's surveillance programs, one thing is clear: It's time for a reckoning. The American people should not have to play guessing games about whether and how their own government is monitoring them. We need a sustained investigation into how far these programs reach into the private lives of American citizens."
WASHINGTON, DC- Nov 17: Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., questions Donald Berwick, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, during the Senate Finance hearing on CMS efforts to carry out provisions under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PL 111-148), the health care overhaul. It was his first appearance at a congressional panel since President Obama appointed him during a congressional recess, circumventing a full-Senate confirmation vote. (Photo by Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly) (Newscom TagID: cqphotos040716.jpg) [Photo via Newscom]
-- Statement from Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, on the phone records collection: "I believe that when law-abiding Americans call their friends, who they call, when they call, and where they call from is private information. Collecting this data about every single phone call that every American makes every day would be a massive invasion of Americans' privacy."
-- Jeffrey Chester, a privacy advocate executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, said the "Obama-backed digital snooping plan makes a mockery" of the president's call for a privacy bill of rights for U.S. residents. "It appears neither citizens or U.S. companies have any concrete right to privacy in reality," he said in an email. "Ironically, what the administration is doing resembles the business models of the Internet giants such as Google and Facebook. They give lip service to consumer privacy, but in reality eavesdrop on nearly everything an individual does."
-- Sharon Bradford Franklin, senior counsel for civil rights advocate the Constitution Project, via email: "The disclosure of this program illustrates dramatically that Congress should not have reauthorized the FISA Amendments Act this past December without incorporating any additional safeguards for Americans' civil liberties. It also demonstrates that the administration's interpretations of surveillance laws should not be kept secret -- a practice that prevents any public debate and meaningful oversight of the broad interpretations being applied to surveillance authorities."
-- Statement from Senator Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, on the phone records collection: "I am deeply disturbed by reports that the FISA Court issued an extremely broad order requiring Verizon turn over to the National Security Agency on a daily basis the company's metadata on its customers' calls. Under this secret court order, millions of innocent Americans have been subject to government surveillance. The Fourth Amendment safeguards liberty by protecting against government abuse of power. Overzealous law enforcement, even when well-intended, carries grave risks to Americans' privacy and liberty." - PC Advisor, 6/7/13
Franken has also joined their call for action:

http://www.minnpost.com/...

Franken, the chairman of the Senate’s Privacy, Technology and the Law Subcommittee, said he’d learned about “programs like this one” through classified briefings before, but he still had questions about the National Security Agency’s practice of requesting records from cellular companies like Verizon.

“We have to see what safeguards there are and how this program is structured, and how this data is used and whether it’s stored, for example,” he said.

On Thursday, the UK’s Guardian reported on a secret April court order requiring Verizon to turn over the “metadata” associated with its users’ cell phone calls: where the user was, who they were talking to, how long the conversation lasted, etc.

Franken was on the way to an intelligence briefing on Thursday afternoon. He said the matter “may very well be” a future topic for his privacy subcommittee to consider.
“I want to learn a lot more about it,” he said. “I’d like the administration to be as transparent as absolutely possible.” - Minn Post, 6/6/13

Some of Franken's colleagues in the Senate have been trying to prevent this sort of scenario from happening:

http://www.lawfareblog.com/...

AURORA,CO--OCTOBER 17TH 2009--Congressman, Mark Udall, during the 9News/Denver Post Health Care Forum,
Carrie Johnson of NPR obtained a 2011 letter from the Department of Justice to Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall, explaining how it collects information using the PATRIOT Act’s Section 215. It said, in part:

Against this backdrop, we do not believe the Executive Branch is operating pursuant to “secret law” or “secret opinions of the Department of Justice.” Rather, the Intelligence Community is conducting court-authorized intelligence activities pursuant to a public statute, with the knowledge and oversight of Congress and the Intelligence Committees of both Houses. There is also extensive oversight by the Executive Branch, including the Department of Justice and relevant agency General Counsels and Inspectors General, as well as annual and semi-annual reports to Congress as required by law.

During his March testimony before the Senate Intelligence Community, DNI James Clapper responded “No” to Senator Wyden’s question regarding the NSA’s data collection efforts on “millions or hundreds of millions of Americans.” Carlos Munoz reminds us of this exchange at The Hill, while Jonathan Weisman refers to last December’s largely uncontroversial re-up of the FISA Amendments, save for Senator Ron Wyden’s impassioned remarks on the floor. - Lawfare, 6/7/13

Franken's actually had a good track record in the Senate on cracking down on phone tracking:

http://www.dailykos.com/...

Euclid, a Palo Alto, Calif.-based start-up that tracks consumer shopping habits in stores via their WiFi enabled smart phones has run smack dab into the ongoing privacy debate in Washington about whether consumers should have to opt-out of being tracked or whether companies should ask permission first.

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), one of the leading privacy hawks in Congress, is a big proponent of the philosophy that consumers should be asked if they want to be tracked before companies track them without their knowledge.

In a letter to Euclid CEO Will Smith, Franken pressed the company to obtain permission
from consumers before tracking them in stores, "especially in the offline world where they are less likely to expect it," Franken wrote Wednesday. "Recent news reports suggest that Euclid's technology has tracked 50 million unique smart phones or other WiFi enabled devices.... I find this troubling." - AdWeek, 3/13/13

Here's a little background on Euclid:

http://thinkprogress.org/...

Euclid doesn’t disclose who their clients are online (although they claim “Top 100 retailers in numerous categories, including specialty apparel, department stores, auto parts and home improvement” as clients), and the only notice consumers get is a vague sign hidden somewhere in the physical store, meaning consumer data is collected largely without their knowledge or consent. And while the MAC data is relatively anonymous, it’s also a unique ID — and the only way to opt out is giving Euclid your MAC address, thus identifying yourself.

Euclid raised $17 million in venture funds earlier this year and have information on over 50 million mobile devices right now. Considering that there are 114 million people in the U.S. using smart phones, that’s a pretty large segment of the consumer audience — large enough to garner interest from at least one senator: In a statement yesterday, Franken expressed concerned about the privacy implications of the system:

“It’s one thing to track someone’s shopping habits through a loyalty card or credit card purchase; folks understand that their information may be collected. It’s another thing entirely to track consumers’ movements without their permission as they shop, especially when someone doesn’t buy anything or even enter a store. People have a fundamental right to privacy, and I think neglecting to ask consumers for their permission to track them violates that right.” - Think Progress, 3/15/13

Franken's even introduced legislation known as the the Location Privacy Protection Act to protect consumers from phone tracking:

http://www.dailykos.com/...

Franken wants to legislate to make location data collection opt-in only. He recently pulled up retail analytics firm Euclid for the opt-out nature of its system.

Euclid works with clothing stores, quick-service restaurants, shopping malls and department stores to measure shopper activity in-store, either by tracking the wi-fi signals given off by mobile phones or by using specially-fitted sensors. It recently landed $17m in financing.

The firm’s privacy policy explains that it “collects only basic device information that is broadcast by wi-fi enabled phones. This does not include any sensitive data such as who you are, whom you call, or the websites you visit”.

But in a letter sent to Euclid on 13 March, Franken said: “It’s one thing to track someone’s shopping habits through a loyalty card or credit card purchase; folks understand that their information may be collected. It’s another thing entirely to track consumers’ movements without their permission as they shop, especially when someone doesn’t buy anything or even enter a store. People have a fundamental right to privacy, and I think neglecting to ask consumers for their permission to track them violates that right.” - Research, 4/4/13

And legislation that makes cell phone transferring easier:
The bi-partisan backed bill would let you keep your phone when you switch providers. Franken says it's a common sense solution, giving people their freedom of choice back.

Currently you can "not" take your phone and switch to another provider at a cheaper price.

Franken says, "It's the way it's been since we had cellphones and smart phones. It's just that the Library of Congress changed it and Congress can change it back and we're going to do it."

So what's the penalty for breaking the law? Senator Franken says it could put you behind bars for up to five years. The bill is set to be vote on in the upcoming weeks. - WDAY News 6, 3/13/13

The NSA story breaking will give Franken a great opportunity to make his privacy legislation key issues for the Senate to take up, hopefully.  President Obama has defended the NSA program but the pressure from lawmakers and the media exposure might be causing him to seriously address this issue:
U.S. President Barack Obama speaks about the sequester after a meeting with congressional leaders at the White House in Washington March 1, 2013. Obama pressed the U.S. Congress on Friday to avoid a government shutdown when federal spending authority runs out on March 27, saying it is the
President Barack Obama declared Friday that America is "going to have to make some choices" balancing privacy and security, launching a vigorous defense of formerly secret programs that sweep up an estimated 3 billion phone calls a day and amass Internet data from U.S. providers in an attempt to thwart terror attacks.

He warned that it will be harder to detect threats against the U.S. now that the two top-secret tools to target terrorists have been so thoroughly publicized.

At turns defensive and defiant, Obama stood by the spy programs revealed this week.
The National Security Agency has been collecting the phone records of hundreds of millions of Americans each day, creating a database through which it can learn whether terror suspects have been in contact with people in the U.S. It also was disclosed this week that the NSA has been gathering all Internet usage - audio, video, photographs, emails and searches - from nine major U.S. Internet providers, including Microsoft and Google, in hopes of detecting suspicious behavior that begins overseas.

"Nobody is listening to your telephone calls," Obama assured the nation after two days of reports that many found unsettling. What the government is doing, he said, is digesting phone numbers and the durations of calls, seeking links that might "identify potential leads with respect to folks who might engage in terrorism." If there's a hit, he said, "if the intelligence community then actually wants to listen to a phone call, they've got to go back to a federal judge, just like they would in a criminal investigation."

While Obama said the aim of the programs is to make America safe, he offered no specifics about how the surveillance programs have done this. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., on Thursday said the phone records sweeps had thwarted a domestic terror attack, but he also didn't offer specifics.

Obama asserted his administration had tightened the phone records collection program since it started in the George W. Bush administration and is auditing the programs to ensure that measures to protect Americans' privacy are heeded - part of what he called efforts to resist a mindset of "you know, 'Trust me, we're doing the right thing. We know who the bad guys are.'" But again, he provided no details on how the program was tightened or what the audit is looking at.

The furor this week has divided Congress, and led civil liberties advocates and some constitutional scholars to accuse Obama of crossing a line in the name of rooting out terror threats.

Obama, himself a constitutional lawyer, strove to calm Americans' fears - but also remind them that Congress and the courts had signed off on the surveillance.

"I think the American people understand that there are some trade-offs involved," Obama said when questioned by reporters at a health care event in San Jose, Calif.
"It's important to recognize that you can't have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience," he said. "We're going to have to make some choices as a society. And what I can say is that in evaluating these programs, they make a difference in our capacity to anticipate and prevent possible terrorist activity."
Obama said U.S. intelligence officials are looking at phone numbers and lengths of calls - not at people's names - and not listening in. - Associated Press, 6/7/13

If you would like to get more information about Senator Franken's legislation, please check out his website:

http://www.franken.senate.gov/

Or you can contact his office for more information:

(202) 224-5641

And if you would like to donate to Al's re-election campaign, you can do so here:

https://secure.actblue.com/...

Originally posted to pdc on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 07:08 PM PDT.

Also republished by The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm glad he focussed on the court opinions (6+ / 0-)

    It's a very important piece.

    If we ever do see them, we've been told, the (lack of) legal reasoning in them is going to be shocking.

    •  strange bit added to quote by PBO (10+ / 0-)

      but the quote, in bold is really interesting..

      If there's a hit, he said, "if the intelligence community then actually wants to listen to a phone call, they've got to go back to a federal judge, just like they would in a criminal investigation."
      well, by that time, the 'call' is over, so how do you unwind time after you go get a warrant to listen to it.

      You have saved the content.

      and with a warrant, now legal..the call is listened to....by a human agent.

      and if the human agents aren't actually listening when the call is made, his statement still works, because ..if I am right, the software, I call it the Machine..or the Soft Machine has listened to the content, found flagged keywords, and perhaps even identified the speaker thru not very secret voice recognition software.

      Thus flagged in any number of ways, including 'all calls from or to these 15 numbers' or whatever discovered from earlier metadata..the already recorded content can then be listened to.
          And preflagged calls from numbers and networks discovered thru the metadata would likely be given a further run thru the Machine, even thru human agents thru FISA court interpretations.
        And good for Senator Al Franken!

      In all the statements, I don't think I have seen any official claiming all content is not recorded.

      I don't think our actual content is examined by some bored government agent, the volume is just too high, but I would not be surprised that the contents of all our calls is not reviewed at the Soft Machine level...which must create a headache when those people drunk, stoned, and grumpy try to fuck with the ebil gubbmint by saying stupid crap on the phone to be ..funny or something.

      And the only real question for me is how long do they keep all the content?

      I do see a lot...a LOT of weasel words and standard legalistic sounding parseing.

      This machine kills Fascists.

      by KenBee on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 08:09:11 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Good post. . . (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        elwior, Don midwest, KenBee, jazzence

        Brings up several thoughts in my mind.

        - I am disturbed by the latest relations, but mostly b/c so many people I trust here are concerned. At this point, from what I have heard about the stored date, it doesn't sound like it is being abused. . . yet. And that is why I trust the people here who know to be pissed.

        -If the court opinions are released on the date of being issued, it would seem to threaten the whole point of security - unless names and pertinent info are redacted.

        -B/C I don't think the opinions can be timely released and keep the security, the law needs to be re-written with far more safeguards.

        -At THIS point, THIS date, I am far less concerned with government collecting info than I am about corporate America selling it. I KNOW the info is/will be abused by big Corp.

        -Exponentially more Americans die of fire arm assault and accidents than any terrorist attack. It is high time to think about just what we are 'securing" and whether or not we are overreacting even post 9/11.

        Great diary, a tremendous resource.

        Blessed are the peacemakers, the poor, the meek and the sick: The "party of Jesus" wouldn't invite him to their convention - fearing his "platform."

        by 4CasandChlo on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 08:20:07 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Here's a summary of the proposal, (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          4CasandChlo

          from last year:

          To require the Attorney General to disclose each decision, order, or opinion of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that includes significant legal interpretation of section 501 or 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 unless such disclosure is not in the national security interest of the United States.

          S.AMDT.3435

          It failed last time because of 10 D against, with 37 D for.
        •  Legal reasoning should never be classified (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          WillR, 4CasandChlo

          There is no need. Specific dates, times, people, etc absolutely, even if they have to block out what the case is about at all. But there is zero reason I can see why any internal administration legal opinion in general should be classified, or why it thinks it has certain powers.

          (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
          Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

          by Sparhawk on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 09:04:32 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  OK - I guess I can go with that. . . (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            gramofsam1

            But (and you are likely an attorney also) as a lawyer, it seems impossible to understand what the reasoning was without the facts. But, I agree that it might well be better than nothing.

            Blessed are the peacemakers, the poor, the meek and the sick: The "party of Jesus" wouldn't invite him to their convention - fearing his "platform."

            by 4CasandChlo on Sun Jun 09, 2013 at 07:39:02 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  I would need to see the context of the PBO quote (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        gramofsam1

        and even then, if it's an extemporaneous utterance, it might just be lacking in precision.

        You seem to be interpreting "if the intel community then actually wants to listen to a phone call, ..." to mean "if the intel community then actually wants to listen to a previously made phone call, ...", and I guess you're interpreting "a phone call" to be the phone call that caused the 'hit'.

        But it could also mean, "If the intel community then wants to listen to a future phone call, then they've got to go to a federal judge [to get a warrant allowing them to tap the phone], just like they would in a [normal] criminal investigation."  

        The "just like they would in a criminal investigation" phrase could suggest that "wants to listen to a phone call" means "wants to tap a phone to listen in on future phone calls", since that's what happens in normal criminal investigations.

        But as I said, I'd need to see the context. :)

  •  looks like their 2012 bill. (5+ / 0-)

    http://beta.congress.gov/...

    Purpose:

    To require the Attorney General to disclose each decision, order, or opinion of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that includes significant legal interpretation of section 501 or 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 unless such disclosure is not in the national security interest of the United States.

  •  Intelligence reauthorization should come up (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    elwior

    later this year, good time to do this.

  •  The cell phone service switching proposal is (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    elwior

    something that I've long wanted.  Glad that some on Congress are taking up that issue. :)

  •  Senator support of democracy worth jail? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    elwior, SouthernLiberalinMD

    the constitutional historian Bruce Fein says that separation of powers is more important for freedom than the bill of rights

    the legislative branch has not done their job

    Is a Senator or a Representative willing to risk spending the rest of their live to protect the constitution and let the American people know what is being done in their name?

  •  Keep up the pressure. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sparhawk

    There are so many conflicting reports right now, that it's better if they come clean and show us the goods. Cause at this point everyone's word is suspect.

    "It strikes me as gruesome and comical that in our culture we have an expectation that a man can always solve his problems" - Kurt Vonnegut

    by jazzence on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 09:01:22 PM PDT

    •  I'd say the people I know have lied to me (0+ / 0-)

      already are the most suspect. Like the NSA itself lying to Congress.

      The greatest voice is the voice of the people-speaking out-in prose, or painting or poetry or music; speaking out-in homes and halls, streets and farms, courts and cafes-let that voice speak and the stillness you hear will be the gratitude of mankind.

      by SouthernLiberalinMD on Sun Jun 09, 2013 at 01:07:02 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  guilt by association (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    olo, SouthernLiberalinMD

    like in the 1950s, you were at risk if you associated with Communists.. the name for that being a "fellow traveler"

    this logging of you you communicate with serves the same purpose

    it is not harmless

    fact does not require fiction for balance (proudly a DFH)

    by mollyd on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 11:45:39 PM PDT

  •  Good diary. n/t (0+ / 0-)

    The greatest voice is the voice of the people-speaking out-in prose, or painting or poetry or music; speaking out-in homes and halls, streets and farms, courts and cafes-let that voice speak and the stillness you hear will be the gratitude of mankind.

    by SouthernLiberalinMD on Sun Jun 09, 2013 at 01:05:27 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site