Skip to main content

"What, me worry?"  

Who knew?  It turns out that huge concerns about global warming are outside the boundaries of the little thought boxes that guide the Army Corps of Engineers.  The single most pressing issue of our time, out of "scope".

The Army Corps of Engineers announced today, in testimony to the US House of Representatives, that their EIS process for the proposed Gateway Pacific Coal Export Terminal (GPT) will exclude "off site" effects such as massive contributions to global warming from the combusted coal.  

Stuck in a Thought Box
To review: Three terminals, to export over 100 million tons of coal to China per year, resulting in gigatons of CO2 pollution and increases in the mercury that already harms our waters and the fish that we eat.  A Keystone-scale impact on our world and climate.  There are well over 101 known reasons to be concerned about these plans, and a vast majority of them have been excluded from consideration by the Corps announcement.  

Nope, our climate, our planet, our waters, are not worth protecting, per the Corps.  If somebody is going to pee in the pool, as long as they do it over there, it's just fine.

From Oregonlive

Jennifer Moyer, acting chief of the Corps' regulatory program, told a House subcommittee today that the agency would review the three proposed export terminals separately, and would not directly address some of the opposition's top concerns. All three projects seek to export Montana and Wyoming coal to Asia through the Northwest.

"Many of the activities of concern to the public, such as rail traffic, coal mining, shipping coal outside of U.S. territory, and the ultimate burning of coal overseas, are outside the Corps' control and responsibility,"

Nothing to See Here -
Just one of the Three Planned Terminals
Here's the complete statement.

From McClatchy

“The corps will limit its focus on emissions to those associated with construction of the facilities,” Jennifer Moyer, acting regulatory chief for the corps told lawmakers. “The effects of burning of coal in Asia or wherever it may be is too far to affect our action.”
Because it's not as if we'll be breathing that same air or anything.  Or living on the same planet.

On a bad news day, it's important to keep the bigger picture in mind.  The EIS process is run by three agencies, not just one.  The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) and the Whatcom County Planning and Development Services (PDS) get to decide their scope.  Yet another WA state agency, Department of Natural Resources, will decide whether to issue a lease for the pier.  

It is possible that the Corps of Engineers is too far away from reality to reach, but the people running that state of Washington are far closer to the impacts, and their voters.

So - Keep calm and carry on!

Our Future - Worth  Saving
Any time you think that you don't have a choice, you actually do.

Any time you think you have to do something that's wrong, you don't.

Not Here
Not Today
Not Any More

We shall not participate in our own destruction.

Previous entries in this series, in chronological order first to most recent:

We shall not participate in our own destruction
Pretty much the dumbest idea ever
Can a community defy a cabal of multi-national corporations?
Great for the coal cabal!  For us, not so much
And So it Begins
Right Brain for This Decision?
101 Reasons to be Concerned About Coal Export
On Refusing to be Rounded out of Existence
Who Are the Welfare Queens Now?
There Is No Daylight
Tis the Season to Decide Our Future
They've Got the Money. We've Got the Humans!
The House of Actual Reality
Permanence
Collision With Reality
Climate Change and Coal Export - Taking Responsibility

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site