Skip to main content

Seal of the National Security Agency
NSA sez all your internets belong to us.
The Guardian reports:
The Obama administration for more than two years permitted the National Security Agency to continue collecting vast amounts of records detailing the email and internet usage of Americans, according to secret documents obtained by the Guardian.

The documents indicate that under the program, launched in 2001, a federal judge sitting on the secret surveillance panel called the Fisa court would approve a bulk collection order for internet metadata "every 90 days". A senior administration official confirmed the program, stating that it ended in 2011.

The collection of these records began under the Bush administration's wide-ranging warrantless surveillance program, collectively known by the NSA codename Stellar Wind.

The report answers some questions but raises many more. First some of the answers:
the [NSA] began "collection of bulk internet metadata" involving "communications with at least one communicant outside the United States or for which no communicant was known to be a citizen of the United States".
Sounds like a Section 702 of FISA program, and reflects all the deficiencies in what appears to have been accepted as legal under that program—namely the lack of a requirement of particularized warrants. It reflects the problematic dragnet approach of how Section 702 has been used. In addition it appears to reflect the 51 percent probability formula for determination of whether a communication comes from a "U.S. person." Of course, under the Bush Administration, the Section 702 fig leaf did not even exist, which leads us to the next answer:
The DoJ quickly convinced the Fisa court to authorize ongoing bulk collection of email metadata records. On 14 July 2004, barely two months after Bush stopped the collection, Fisa court chief judge Collen Kollar-Kotelly legally blessed it under a new order – the first time the surveillance court exercised its authority over a two-and-a-half-year-old surveillance program.
On what basis did the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court (FISC) issue that order? Remember, Section 702 did not even exist in 2004. For determining whether the FISA court is a rubber stamp, understanding the basis of this order would be important. Another strong reason for more transparency from the FISA court.

For some of the questions raised follow me to the other side.  

The essential questions for me are the following:

(1) What was the impetus for ending the program in 2011? The Guardian reports:

"The internet metadata collection program authorized by the Fisa court was discontinued in 2011 for operational and resource reasons and has not been restarted," Shawn Turner, the Obama administration's director of communications for National Intelligence, said in a statement to the Guardian. "The program was discontinued by the executive branch as the result of an interagency review," Turner continued. He would not elaborate further.
"Operational and resource reasons" means what exactly? Was it connected to the reported 2011 FISA court opinion declaring some surveillance programs unlawful?

 (2) Was the discontinued program replaced by any other programs? The Guardian reports:

[W]hile that specific program has ended, additional secret NSA documents seen by the Guardian show that some collection of Americans' online records continues today. In December 2012, for example, the NSA launched one new program allowing it to analyze communications with one end inside the US, leading to a doubling of the amount of data passing through its filters.
If true, then the following questions arise:

(3) Were those programs approved by the FISA court? Under what legal authority?

In the end, a lot of questions can be answered by more transparency regarding the FISA court approval process, both to know what has been submitted for approval, what has not, what has been approved and on what grounds.

While much needs to be learned before definitive judgments can be reached, a good starting point would be (1) to know what the FISA court knows and does not know, (2) what is has approved and not approved, and (3) on what basis.

Originally posted to Armando on Thu Jun 27, 2013 at 09:15 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site