Skip to main content

Congressional Report on the Offshoring of Jobs (December 2012)

Passages in this post were excerpted from the report "Offshoring (or Offshore Outsourcing) and Job Loss Among U.S. Workers" [The extension of task fragmentation] by Linda Levine, Specialist in Labor Economics, December 17, 2012. This is a CRS Report prepared for members and committees of Congress. The full report is here in PDF. Please read this very comprehensive (and somewhat disturbing) report on the future of offshoring American jobs to low-wage countries.

The change in the skill (educational) level of jobs being moved abroad has led some to wonder whether the offshoring of service, unlike production, activities will result in college graduates facing a dwindling supply of entry-level jobs that have traditionally served as stepping-stones to higher skilled and higher paying positions.

The notion that offshoring depresses job growth in the United States appears to underlie support among some policymakers for measures meant to encourage U.S. firms to expand employment domestically rather than abroad. While some members of the public policy community also support the adoption by other countries of trade and labor policies intended to level the playing field for U.S. companies and workers in the international marketplace, still others advocate for limited government intervention as the best means of promoting economic growth.

The overseas relocation of manufacturing work predates by decades the recent wave of services offshoring. Major U.S. companies, initially responding to heightened competition from Japanese and European multinational corporations, opened facilities abroad during the 1970s and 1980s that turned out goods formerly produced by comparatively well paid, often unionized U.S. factory workers (e.g., assembly-line workers in the auto industry).

U.S. companies reacted to the back-to-back recessions of the early 1980s by focusing on their core missions and contracting out activities that specialized domestic enterprises could perform more efficiently (e.g., janitorial services). Firms also restructured their operations by outsourcing jobs to employees of temporary help agencies, professional and business services
establishments (e.g., accounting firms), and independent contractors located in the United States. The persistence of these changes over time indicates that domestic outsourcing of formerly in-house functions is a permanent reorganization of how work is performed in the United States.

Another development was the educational systems of low-wage foreign nations graduating an abundant supply of well educated (sometimes English-speaking) individuals. In some cases, the number of persons with IT and accounting skills reportedly exceeded the immediate needs of their local economies (e.g., China, Eastern Europe, India, and the Philippines). With English the language of the computer industry worldwide, IT services can be provided from many non-English-speaking, comparatively low-wage nations (e.g., Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Jordan, Lithuania, Mexico, Slovenia, Russia, and Ukraine).

Research suggests that the extension of task fragmentation to service activities accounts for the greater relative contribution of offshoring to increased wage dispersion (inequality) in the United States in recent decades. Technological change and de-unionization appear to have accounted for relatively more of the so-called polarization of wages that occurred during the1980s and 1990s.

Researchers have mostly focused on determining which jobs are susceptible to being moved abroad and then on estimating U.S. employment in these potentially offshorable activities in a given year. One such empirical analysis was undertaken in the early years of services offshoring by Bardhan and Kroll. They estimated that more than 14 million jobs in 49 service occupations, representing about 11% of total U.S. employment in 2001, have attributes that could allow them to be sent overseas.

The occupational groups identified as being vulnerable to offshoring include office support (e.g., data entry and payroll clerks), auditors and tax preparers, computer programmers and software engineers, medical transcriptionists and paralegals, and technical writers. They are concentrated in such industries within the service sector as information, finance and insurance, and professional and business services.

The researchers also took an occupational approach and created an index of offshorability for hundreds of blue-collar, white-collar, and service occupations based on the degree to which the jobs required personal interaction that necessitated workers to be in close proximity to customers. It was estimated that a majority of occupations (533) and employed persons (92.6 million in 2004) are non offshorable—that is, they are completely immune to offshoring. Conversely, it's estimated that a minority of U.S. occupations (about 200) and workers (almost 30 million) fall in the highly offshorable and offshorable categories. Two categories were considered, which included 22.2% of U.S. workers in 2004, too conservative an estimate of potentially offshorable jobs in light of technological and other advances expected to arise in the coming years...and  totals almost 40 million workers --- or 29% of all U.S. jobs.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (7+ / 0-)

    If people won't go protest in the streets, then they'll end up sleeping on them instead.

    by Bud Meyers on Fri Jun 28, 2013 at 02:08:17 AM PDT

  •  U.S. enterprise has always relied on (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    radarlady, mollyd, NoMoreLies, unfangus

    free or nearly free labor. In the beginning there were indentured servants, African slaves and captive natives. Later there were young adult immigrants whose basic skill sets had been acquired at some other country's expense and then expropriated by the U.S. Finally, in the middle of the last century, when the country began to fill up and the expenses of raising the young and teaching them ourselves began to add up, it was cheaper to just export the work and have it done somewhere else. The ex-men, they


    The ex-men are middlemen, predatory humans who take without giving anything back. For some reason, our binary model of the economy, focused on producers and users, overlooks the role of the middlemen sitting at the nexus and, like highwaymen of old, taking a "cut" from whatever and whoever passes. Letting them do it with currency (also a kind of middle agent or mediator) makes it seem less onerous until their greed overwhelms the system.

    X-men at the crossroads of trade and exchange. The symbol is actually very telling. X marks the spot where we get rooked.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Fri Jun 28, 2013 at 02:32:25 AM PDT

  •  'Notion' that offshoring depresses US job growth? (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    radarlady, mollyd, NoMoreLies, nchristine

    I've never read so many euphemisms, Orwellian management doublespeak and outright whoppers in my life.  This is a laughably poor attempt that tries to put lipstick on a pig and ends up drunkenly slathering Jackson Pollock patterns all over the bathroom walls...

    The reality that offshoring depresses US job growth is only a "notion".  Never mind that offshoring at best creates crappy jobs abroad and at home.  We'll ignore that and postulate about whether there is net job growth or no.  Because replacing a good union factory job with three Walmart/gas station/McDonalds jobs is Progress (TM).

    Almost every line herein is a treasure of buffoonery, but one more deserves special mention:

    U.S. companies reacted to the back-to-back recessions of the early 1980s by focusing on their core missions and contracting out activities that specialized domestic enterprises could perform more efficiently (e.g., janitorial services).
    Ah yes, because it has been so much more "efficient" and therefore "beautiful" in neo-lib-speak to subcontract out services like janitorial jobs.  The result?  Jobs that formerly tended to be more higher-wage, full-time, unionized, more stable and laden with some benefits turned into minimum-wage, part-time, non-union, temp jobs with no benefits.  

    But they are more "efficient"!  Once again, Progress (TM).

    Shame on whoever produced this claptrap.  It reads like it was produced directly out of an ALEC or Chamber of Commerce template.  Pathetic.  

  •  Prone (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Prone to be offshored doesn't necessarily mean they will be, just that the potential exists.  Frankly I think this offshoring trend is coming to an end.  

    Cynicism is what passes for insight among the mediocre.

    by Sky Net on Fri Jun 28, 2013 at 03:10:08 AM PDT

    •  If this immigration bill (0+ / 0-)

      piece of monstrous crap passes in its current form, offshoring will be affected. There will be hundreds of thousands of scabs from India and China here to take the jobs at starvation wages in this country. The H-1B increase as well as total end of limits on green cards will devastate US citizen college graduates.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site