Skip to main content

You emailed me from an anonymous address after stumbling upon an article of mine on Reddit – "NSA Rejecting Every FOIA Request Made by U.S. Citizens."

You said that you were a progressive – a two-time voter for Obama (like myself) – and that you'd decided to reach out, to find my contact information, after surveying my recent article history.

You told me that, at worst, I was no progressive and, at best, I was a poor sap who had fallen for one of many faux scandal traps set by the GOP. You told me that a real progressive would recognize the NSA story for what it really is: a distraction meant to derail President Obama's efforts to achieve important social and environmental reforms.

Then you broadened this argument, insisting that all the focus on NSA surveillance – essential to keep us safe – was about harming Democrats in the 2014 elections and damaging Hillary Clinton's changes for the presidency in 2016.

It's all electoral politics, you said. And that in writing about the issue, and critiquing the Obama administration in the process, all I was doing was damaging our country. That I was doing the GOP's work. That I was promoting someone who had broken the law, Edward Snowden, while bashing Obama's legal and sanctioned efforts to keep us safe.

You asked me to stop.

And I thought, How many other writers have you similarly emailed? before taking the unusual step to respond.

I responded to you because, while I disagreed with nearly everything you wrote, you were articulate, quite cogent and relatively cordial.

I expressed a hope that – in the interest of consistency – you had never criticized the Bush administration on similar issues. That you had never spoken out against its championing of the Patriot Act, its broadening of the NSA's surveillance infrastructure, its torture program.

I asked if you considered investigative journalism, like that conducted by Glenn Greenwald and McClatchy, to be nothing more than conservative smear campaigns, rather than essential for the public good. And if so, whether you thought the New York Times's publishing of the Pentagon Papers was similarly political in nature, rather than evidence of the Fourth Estate's proper place in American politics.

Then I wrote that I considered it a progressive value to defend our privacy rights and to highlight governmental abuses of power – no matter who is in office.

I wrote that a desire to protect our Fourth Amendment rights has nothing to do with electoral politics, and everything to do with protecting individual Americans from illegal intrusions, something about which the 'founding fathers' were particularly concerned.

I wrote that Edward Snowden is indeed a hero who had broken existing laws in order to alert Americans to what he, and many others, consider to be gross violations of our constitutional rights. I wrote that sometimes, in American history, brave people have had to break the law, to be disobedient, in order to do what is right. That "legal" does not always, in the end, mean "constitutional."

I asked you if you similarly admonished Daniel Ellsberg for breaking the law, or Martin Luther King, Jr., or any number of progressive protesters, from Vietnam-era activists to Occupy Wall Street marchers, who have been accused of any number of law-breaking actions.

You never responded.

And so now I'm writing publicly to you, not so much as a re-opening of our dialogue as an occasion to air my contrasting views to those who are defending Obama his 'national security' ventures in the name of progressivism or liberalism.

Though if you see this, I'd like to continue our dialogue. While I can't accept your perspective, ours is still a discussion worth having.

Best,
David Harris-Gershon


Originally posted to David Harris-Gershon (The Troubadour) on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 10:45 AM PDT.

Also republished by Writing by David Harris Gershon.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences