Skip to main content

U.S. President Barack Obama discusses the economy and the latest employment figures alongside his new head of the Economic Council, Gene Sperling (L), at Thompson Creek Window Company in Landover, Maryland, January 7, 2011.   REUTERS/Jason Reed   (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS BUSINESS) - RTXWB8S
You know what would be a really, really crappy idea? Making cuts to programs that are keeping millions from poverty in order to make a bad economy marginally better. But that's what President Obama's top economic advisor—Gene Sperling, director of the White House’s National Economic Council—is telling Democrats they'll have to swallow.
In his usual elliptical and prolix way, Sperling seemed to be laying out the contours of a bargain with Republicans that’s quite a bit different that what most Democrats seem prepared to accept. What stood out to me was how he kept winding back around to the importance of entitlement cuts as part of a deal, as if he were laying the groundwork to blunt liberal anger. Right now, the official Democratic position is that they’ll accept entitlement cuts only in exchange for new revenue—something most Republicans reject. If Sperling mentioned revenue at all, I missed it.

But he dwelt at length—and with some passion—on the need for more stimulus, though he avoided using that dreaded word. He seemed to hint at a budget deal that would trade near-term “investment” (the preferred euphemism for “stimulus’) for long-term entitlement reform. That would be an important shift and one that would certainly upset many Democrats. [...]

“Sometimes here [in Washington] we start to think that the end goal of our public policy is to hit a particular budget or spending or revenue metric—as if those are the goals in and of itself. But it’s important to remember that each of these metrics … are means to larger goals. … Right now, I think there is among a lot of people a consensus as to what the ingredients of a pro-growth fiscal policy are. It would be a fiscal policy that—yes—did give more confidence in the long run that we have a path on entitlement spending and revenues that gives confidence in our long-term fiscal position and that we’re not pushing off unbearable burdens to the next generation. That is very important.”

Yeah, that would upset many Democrats. It would upset a helluva lot of voters, too. Millions and millions of them who have every reason right now to vote against Republicans. It would probably also not go over too well with the next generation who's going to be far less impacted by the national debt than by having no hope of a secure retirement because a handful of austerity fetishists sold them up the river when they were young.

Sperling is saying that this will have to be done because "we still need to give this recovery more momentum." Because of course the answer to the recovery is sacrificing some old people. By all means, get their skin in the game. They maybe have an inch or two of skin to spare.

President Obama doesn't have to worry about another election, but he does have to worry about his legacy. It'd help his legacy if it wasn't his policies that undid the legacies of FDR and LBJ. It'd also help all the Democrats who do have to worry about the next election, and the one after that and then the next, if they stop talking about cutting Social Security and Medicare and start working on making them stronger.

Sign the petition from Senator Bernie Sanders, Daily Kos and an enormous coalition of progressives demanding that Congress and the President oppose any grand bargain which cuts Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Oct 25, 2013 at 03:57 PM PDT.

Also republished by Pushing back at the Grand Bargain and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Bob Johnson, schemp, claude, chrississippi, Armando, copymark, deben, glitterscale, Em, Gooserock, johnmorris, Shockwave, liz, genethefiend, eeff, devtob, dpeifer1949, geordie, TheMomCat, Nate Roberts, wonmug, ctsteve, Dallasdoc, Eyesbright, KayCeSF, Gowrie Gal, 3goldens, denise b, ek hornbeck, Simplify, MT Spaces, J Rae, YucatanMan, Laurence Lewis, ratzo, SBandini, WisePiper, coloradorob, Ekaterin, mightymouse, Jim P, Keone Michaels, Medium Head Boy, cybersaur, rl en france, KenBee, kck, blueoasis, triv33, TalkieToaster, el cid, sceptical observer, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, blueoregon, kurt, Johnathan Ivan, NonnyO, BentLiberal, ammasdarling, FishOutofWater, Mary Mike, CTDemoFarmer, dclawyer06, aliasalias, HCKAD, mudslide, leonard145b, Assaf, South Park Democrat, seriously70, JeffW, ratador, JaxDem, OleHippieChick, Sixty Something, crescentdave, Involuntary Exile, bythesea, CenFlaDem, JamieG from Md, Mayfly, BerkshireDem, ewmorr, jennylind, Keith Pickering, ArthurPoet, catilinus, FogCityJohn, roadbear, piers, Lost and Found, Johnny Q, Nada Lemming, Oh Mary Oh, coquiero, boomerchick, PorridgeGun, Liberal Jon, muddy boots, tardis10, enhydra lutris, peregrine kate, JoeEngineer, rlk, ratcityreprobate, SouthernLiberalinMD, quill, DeadHead, IndieGuy, Eric Nelson, a2nite, This old man, Mike RinRI, lunachickie, jennyp, terrybuck, oldpotsmuggler, peptabysmal, this just in, jusjtim35, poopdogcomedy, JerryNA, howabout, bob152, greenbell, Patango, WFBMM, starduster, Tronsix2, Liberty Equality Fraternity and Trees, jbsoul, Penny GC, ballanross, ApostleOfCarlin, Selphinea, socialismorbarbarism

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site