Skip to main content

In my last diary, I discussed the recent blizzard two-inch snow that paralyzed metro Atlanta's roads and highways. Now, state and local officials have received a great deal of criticism for their horribly delayed decisions to ask people to stay home, and rightfully so. What hasn't gotten so much attention is something I mentioned in one of the comments but deserves its own discussion:

"If an employee chooses not to come in, that will be a vacation day. Working longer other days or working a weekend day to make up time is not an option... If an employee leaves work early due to inclement weather, and the [employer] is still open, that is vacation time."
That was an official work email sent to a friend of mine the day before the storm. She's a librarian.

There is no excuse for this. None. If the weather or other civil emergency poses a clear and present danger to one's being able to commute to work or school, then he or she deserves the right to stay home without receiving any retribution or retaliation. Even if we accept this ridiculous notion that a corporation is a person, and that it allegedly has the right to attempt to make a profit, a civilized society must place human rights on a higher pedestal.

We need laws at the state and federal level to protect this right. Call it the "Right to a Safe Commute Act" or something. It should give protection to employees, their children, and school students any time that:

1. There exists a clear and present hazard at the affected person's place of residence, work, school, or the routine commute between the two; (This can include anyone who travels while at work.)
2. That could reasonably be expected to disrupt that person's ability to work, be in school, or commute to or from work or school; i.e., is not a hazard that would be reasonably expected to be accounted for and dealt with; (The actual law would probably need lists of examples and specific cases. More on this clause in a bit.)
3. That is not initiated by, nor a result of negligence or recklessness on the part of, the affected person;

Then he or she should receive immunity from any kind of retribution, punishment, or retaliation for that danger's causing the affected person's to arrive late at work or school; for declining to perform any duties related to traveling or that otherwise pose an imminent threat; or, if the danger does not subside, for staying home.

Here's the idea. This needs to be written in a way that doesn't account for ordinary troubles--traffic jams, non-severe and non-flooding rainstorms in an area that is used to rain, etc. But any time there's a tornado warning, or a major snowfall, or a civil disturbance, etc., people should have the right to come to work late or not at all. And if you get broken into, your home catches on fire, etc., you deserve the next day off to regroup (it almost always takes far longer than that, but at the very least, one full day).

Obviously this is just a draft and is well away from any final form. First of all, we'd have to close any loopholes that are big enough to drive a truck through Part (2) in particular would require clarification to ensure that while workers' and students' rights are protected, instances of people taking advantage of this to take the day off for trivial reasons should be rare. And that is where you guys come in. I'd love for as many people as possible to write their own versions of this. Please don't forget to reference this diary, but beyond that, it's all yours. The more progressive contributions we can get to "Right to a Safe Commute Act," the better.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site