Skip to main content

When it comes to discussing United States civil court policy, which frankly I do more than some of my friends might like, I have to thank Newport News, Virginia civil courts for illustrating a trend.

Newport News, a city of 180,000 people, helps me make the point that my hometown of Los Angeles is in a different league for civil court forum shopping than the rest of California, even though it was the entire state that a national tort reform group recently labeled a "Judicial Hellhole."

In a previous Huffington Post blog, I listed many reasons to agree with California's "Hellhole" designation, although my reasons differed from criteria developed by the Washington D.C. based American Tort Reform Association, known in D.C. as ATRA. Mostly, in L.A., the really hellish conditions stem not from rich lawyers suing rich corporations, but from a half-decade of state budget neglect totaling around a billion dollars.

California Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye recently called lack of access to courts a "new civil rights issue." The Chief Justice stated,"... we are rationing justice, and its become more than a fiscal problem. It is in my view now a civil rights problem. Because when you can no longer guarantee timely access to justice, and you can no longer provide litigants a courtroom in his or her community of his or her peers, then we know we are denying the protections of an American democracy."

A "courtroom in his or her" community is increasingly hard to come by, with 51 courthouses and 205 courtrooms closed in 2012.

Which brings us back to Newport News. My point is that an individual jurisdiction can build a civil court separately from state laws. Forbes magazine recently named Virginia as the 2013 "most friendly to business." Forbes gushed that "... Virginia ranks first among the states in the regulatory category because of its business-friendly government policies and strong incentive offerings. The tort system is one of the best in the country for businesses..."

Even the relatively caustic Hellhole editors offered a nod to the state-city difference, noting that "... despite Virginia's generally conservative tort jurisprudence" and "recent reform" the Newport News courts had another environment. It is surprising that the Hellhole site alleges, "... the [Newport News] court has set a low bar for scientific reliability of expert testimony, relaxed causation standards, hidden from juries what the plaintiff's employer knew... and prevented product makers from asserting widely-accepted defenses." Apparently the court sometimes uses maritime law to bypass those Virginia reforms.

Fair enough -- I always say that one person's Judicial Hellhole is another's last bastion of American justice.

But Newport News reflects a trend that hit Los Angeles hard: Civil courts may be "statewide," but specific cities create their own justice ecosystems that attract a higher volume of cases, either locally grown or from "forum shopping" lawyers. When the chief justice says our slow courts are becoming a civil rights issue, she doesn't mean for Angelenos with the money to lawyer up, she means for the urban groups that are often underserved by other government functions; family court, eviction court, and small claims courts.

From a distance, it might not be obvious -- yet -- that L.A. has become different from the rest of California. After all, being a lawsuit-friendly city in a lawsuit-friendly state is hardly the stark contrast between Newport News and the rest of Virginia. Yet, L.A. is different, and the civil courts in my city are increasingly closed to traditionally underserved minority communities and likely fail to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The chief justice is right: this is a civil rights issue.

Access to justice in Los Angeles has become more difficult than it is elsewhere, even in much of California. And while I'm not the first to note that whatever happens in California eventually makes its way across the country, that trend is coming to deny access to a courthouse near you.

(Sara Corcoran Warner is publisher of the non-profit California Courts Monitor website, "your daily ration of civil justice rationing." The website will launch a D.C.-based sister website, the National Courts Monitor, later this month.)

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  California is making things worse. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FarWestGirl, DelilahOhMy

    Every "private right of action" law helps keep the lawyers fed and the courts full.  It also necessarily reduces employment in the state government.

  •  Statewide problem (0+ / 0-)

    Sorry if this is a double-post.  Think I did something wrong the first time.
    The entire CA judicial system is crumbling and in shambles.  But one thing that is clear is that the priorities of the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) and the CA Judicial Council, which "oversees" the AOC, are a major reason access to justice is being diminished. Their role in this fiasco should not be overlooked; and, contrary to the whining and finger-pointing, all blame does not lie with the Gov, or the Legislature, or just the budget cuts to the judicial branch.

    How do you explain closing hundreds of courtrooms, numerous entire courthouses, and laying off thousands of trial court employees, at the same time you choose to build palatial new courthouses throughout the state? Granted, some counties need new or repaired courthouses, but who is going to staff additional courtrooms in new courthouses when you've closed others and laid off the staff to go with them?  And even though the excuse is that courthouse construction money comes from a different and dedicated pot of money, how did that decision get made and why not now advocate for the position that most of those dollars should be redirected toward keeping existing courthouses open and staffed?  Follow the money.

    An example:  From the Alliance of CA Judges:  

    September 26, 2013
    31 Courtrooms in Long Beach cost $2.3 billion over 35 years
    Dear California Media,

    We write to highlight our continuing concerns about the Court Facilities Program.

    First we offer an editorial written by Milt Policzer of the Courthouse News Service regarding the Long Beach Courthouse, published September 23, 2013:

    (Please read the referenced article at the following link and then watch the 2-minute video of this overpriced, money-guzzling vanity piece of a courthouse.)  Where should the outrage lie?  And that's just for starters.

    LB Courthouse Takes Off

  •  It happens that I was reviewing our county's stats (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    just last week and parts of Oregon are pretty bad, as well. Lincoln County, OR has had up to 800 days' wait for a civil suit to get a court date.

    Oregon courts 2011

    Information is abundant, wisdom is scarce. ~The Druid.
    ~Ideals aren't goals, they're navigation aids.~

    by FarWestGirl on Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 12:50:19 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site