There's been a lot of talk lately about the crude oil export ban -- a regulation on exports of crude (as opposed to refined) oil that the oil industry hates. They've recently started a campaign, it seems, to pressure their friends in Congress to relax this regulation. Of course, their only motivation is increased profits...climate be damned.
Unfortunately, relaxing the crude oil export ban would be a disaster for our climate, resulting increased oil production that would amount to emissions equivalent of 42 coal plants.
Oil Change International released new analysis today that shows that relaxing the crude oil export regulations would incentivize billions of barrels of production of oil in the United States, resulting in 9.9 billion barrels of new oil that would equal 4.4 billion metric tons of CO2equivalent emissions. That's massive, equal to building 42 coal plants!
Here's OCI's press release on the report:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEOil Change International is calling on the President to defend the existing crude oil export ban. You can add your voice, by taking action here.
3 MARCH 2014
David Turnbull, david [at] priceofoil [dot] org
New Report Outlines Climate Costs of Relaxing Crude Oil Export Regulations
Allowing crude oil exports could add emissions equivalent of 42 coal plants
A new analysis published today by Oil Change International – Lifting the Ban, Cooking the Climate - shows that eliminating existing regulations on crude oil exports could result in additional greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 42 coal fired power plants.
The analysis shows that allowing crude oil exports would eliminate a current price gap between the U.S. oil price benchmark and the global average. This increased price for U.S. crude oil on the global market would incentivize increased U.S. oil production on the order of 9.9 billion barrels between 2015 and 2050, adding more than 4.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent into the atmosphere.
“Removing the crude export ban would be a disaster for the climate. President Obama and the U.S. Congress need to stand up to Big Oil and defend the current regulations if he is actually serious about addressing our climate crisis,” said Stephen Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International.
Big Oil’s leading lobbyists from ExxonMobil and the American Petroleum Institute have led the charge to relax the ban, and they have spending big in Washington to push their agenda. The leading proponent of relaxing the oil export regulations, Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has received over three-quarters of a million dollars from the oil industry in recent years.
“Big Oil’s push for deregulation is all about profits and nothing more, no matter the consequences for our climate and communities. To push for more oil drilling at a time when our communities are facing climate chaos everyday is to deny the reality of climate change,” Kretzmann said.
The analysis released today can be found here: http://priceofoil.org/...
Previous Oil Change International analysis of the crude oil export ban can be found here: