Skip to main content

Think of Intelligence as "weaponized information." It is not a passive cerebral business. It can and does kill. Witness drones in current history. In war, it is an active part of targeting so people die as a result of it. People die protecting it, sometimes unwittingly. Read on for links, postings, rationale, & comments. This Diary will be updated periodically.

The story goes beyond the very sick culture of an organization who has a primary operational directive for absolute secrecy beyond these very distinguishable attributes within the NSA and related black organizations.

To recap: The dominant pathological organizational disorders rampant within the NSA are obvious:

1. Paranoid
2. Obsessive compulsive
3. Sociopathic
4. Grandiose
5. Narcissistic (self-rationalizing)
6. Uber-patriotic (self-justifying)

http://www.dailykos.com/...

Just look at the things official sources say. You will always be able to identify at least one of these characteristics permeating the text or lurking behind the lines.

Although powerful individuals, corporations, and political groups may also share these traits, the NSA hosts some unique attributes that set it apart from other manifestations of a pathologically ill organization:

1. One takes the security oath BEFORE one knows first hand what the commitment means.  Too bad if one KNOWS it is patently illegal.  You don't stay in if you disagree. You can't stay, period. So "99.99%" of the career spooks are 100% bought in are totally committed and believe they are in the right or that ends justify means. The organization is for "believers" only.

2. If you openly disagree, you are treated like you are mentally ill AND a security threat. Expect bad reviews and pretences that will muster you OUT.

3. If you go "outside" to complain, the penalties are severe: 30 years in prison, in war-time unauthorized disclosure can qualify as high treason punishable by death. Post 9/11, who knows what can go down when there is no such thing as "out of bounds."

But here's the real deal, Intelligence is "weaponized information." People do die, and too often completely innocent people, and this business of death has been going on for a very long time. The scope and impact of a characterologically disordered operational unit of the government whose mission is death to threats can not be overstated.
It is in this last aspect where the risk has the potential to most virulent and dangerous because as an agent of death NSA actions still remain quite hidden. Nothing Snowden has revealed to date, for example, speaks of what has been, is current, will be acted upon in the future or who the target could be or the degree of sanction.
Just look here for a brief "mega view" primer of activities that have intelligence worms permeating the events:  

35 Countries Where the U.S. Has Supported Fascists, Drug Lords and Terrorists
http://www.alternet.org/...

The Korean Airline Flight 007 (aka KAL 007) shootdown near Kamchatka.
http://www.sianews.com/...
There are backup resources referenced in this article.
I will personally confirm "Ferret" activity as a routine activity for US military involved with NSA. I was on an RC130 during the Vietnam war sent to provoke suspected Chinese AAA batteries into firing at my aircraft over the Plains des Jarres in Laos. They fired.

The USAF Security Service (at the time called USAFSS) had regularly scheduled RC135 on the Soviet northern borders. I flew on similar operations down the eastern Chinese coast into the Gulf of Tonkin in the early 1970s. The Soviet routes existed then.

One minor adjustment to item [5] in this article. The "10 minutes" alert time to the president, Regan, is generous. Every single operational RC135 has had an equivalent of a "red phone" with a capability to communicate directly with the POTUS in real time.

This article closes with "What the President had called "the Soviet massacre', was in fact the first American sacrifice of the Reagan presidency." Essentially true. Even if the decision not to warn KAL007 was made on the RC135 or Pueblo style Navy vessels and not in Washington, those officers would be following rule #1 in the NSA world: protect sources, protect monitoring capabilities, protect disclosing operations above all else, whatever the cost.

There can't be a better classic example, highly documented in history, of the assertion made here: Intelligence does and can kill anyone. Friend or Foe.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Cough? (0+ / 0-)

    Just saying.

  •  I mostly agree with the premise of this diary... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    3rdOption, 207wickedgood, kurt

    However, your definition of "treason" is hyperbolic. At least for this country, as enumerated in the U.S. Constitution.

    3. If you go "outside" to complain, the penalties are severe: 30 years in prison, in war-time unauthorized disclosure can qualify as high treason punishable by death. Post 9/11, who knows what can go down when there is no such thing as "out of bounds."
    What you're describing is espionage. But not treason.

    This is treason...

    Article III - Section 3.
    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
    This definition is one aspect of our Constitution that remains unchanged by 9-11.

    'Cuz freedom can't protect itself ~~ EFF ~ EPIC ~ ACLU

    by markthshark on Sat Mar 08, 2014 at 02:59:36 PM PST

    •  NSA is in the AI race, hoping to be first to (0+ / 0-)

      reach the singularity. Different subject but far more disastrous. James Barrat writes that most researchers expect ultraintelligence will threaten the species. Ethics or benign development not happening.

    •  Death for treason, death for espionage = DEATH (0+ / 0-)

      Thank you for the definition. However, I will stand by what I said. You can be executed for both, treason or espionage. The key word "war" is critical in this context.  Differences are splitting hairs on the kind of definitional matters the legal system loves. I will say there is lots of wiggle room in AIII.3, particularly with the restriction to the word "conviction" and "open court." The current Guantanamo prisoner snarl is precisely about this wiggle room problem and what to do about it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site