Skip to main content

Should President Obama use Executive Actions to improve  our Democracy?

In the struggle to implement many of his progressive plans for the betterment of the citizens of our Nation, President Obama has faced the most recalcitrant, stubborn and misguided opposition from the right wing of the Republican party.

At the very start of President Obama's first term, one Mitch McConnell actually put it into words with this statement "We plan to make this man a one term president."  So this is how it has gone and gone and gone. If President Obama chooses, he has the "legal" authority to use "Executive Action" to advance his agenda.  Of course, when he does, the Tea Party and fanatical right wing will scream that he is becoming a dictator.  That of course is all smoke and mirrors.  Ronnie Reagan was prolific in his use of executive action, and certainly not  for the betterment of the middle class or progressive America.

Michael Waldman writes in the Daily Beast: Presidents have long acted within their authority, from Jefferson’s purchase of Louisiana without consulting Congress to Lincoln’s freeing the slaves by proclamation.  With Congress paralyzed, President Obama has promised to use his “pen and phone” to overcome the ongoing dysfunction and get some work done.
Using every tactic, from blocking the President's choices for judicial nominations to trying to repeal ACA, this Congress has acted with childish impunity to interfere with any attempts to put America back on track after eight disastrous years of Bush/Cheney.  No progress toward reconciliation or negotiations has left the President with few tools to combat this "Party of NO".

What are the options?  

Do we support our President in using "The Pen" to neuter this bunch of obstructionists?  There are already rumblings of hate from the far right of secession, armed confrontation and other hateful demonstrations by the right wingnut fringe.  Is it possible that this President, a Black man and a Democrat, doing what is a legal thing for any President, will tip this country into violent actions by some deluded anarchists.  Very possible, remotely possible or they will crawl back under their rock to spew at a later date.  I doubt that rush limbaw could actually stir up and muster a group of rag-tag gunslingers who would have the internal fortitude to engage in a real armed confrontation with this Nations strength.

In the confrontations with this divided dysfunctional congress the President can "take it to them" by using his legal constitutional powers.  This can move them off dead center and announce to them "Either lead, follow or get the hell out of the way."

From the Brennan Center for Justice: Waldman and collaborators have lined out ways President Obama can advance the progressive agenda.

1.Commission a Justice Department report, The Constitution in 2025, modeled after The Constitution in the Year 2000.
2. Direct federal agencies to find ways to increase voter participation nationwide.
3. Direct federal agencies to accept designation as NVRA (National Voter Registration Act) agencies.
4. Enlist the private sector to assure free and fair elections.
5. Appoint Republicans and Democrats to the Election Assistance and Federal Election Commissions.
6. Sign an executive order requiring disclosure of political spending by entities awarded government contracts.
7. Request that the Securities and Exchange Commission issue regulations requiring disclosure of corporate political spending.
8. Request that the Federal Communications Commission require more thorough disclaimers of outside spending on political advertisements.
9. Create a Presidential Commission on Mass Incarceration, modeled after the “Kerner Commission.”
10. Issue an executive order directing federal agencies to recast their criminal justice grants in a Success-Oriented Funding model.
11. Direct the Justice Department to identify federal prisoners to whom the Fair Sentencing Act would retroactively apply, and recommend commutations for all those eligible, barring exceptional circumstances.
12. Issue an executive order to “ban the box” on federal agency job applications, except for law enforcement positions.
13. Direct the Attorney General to issue new guidance banning discriminatory law enforcement techniques.
14. Request that the Attorney General survey the use of “secret law” in the federal government and develop procedures to make the law public.
15. Issue an executive order applying key federal information-sharing restrictions to “suspicious activity reports” provided by state and local law enforcement.
To some this may come across as too "draconian" but to Progressives it is a call to support a President who is fighting for Middle America.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/...

http://www.brennancenter.org/...

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CwV, Paragryne

    Banks will only lend you money if you can prove you don't need it.

    by olegar on Sat Apr 19, 2014 at 06:24:38 AM PDT

  •  Of course he can and should use EOs (0+ / 0-)

    whenever he needs or wants to advance the agenda we voted for.  I demand it.  Screw the Tea Party and obstructionists.

    I have observed that Obama has been able to advance key ideas simply through voice or power of suggestion.  Marriage equality, minimum wage, legalized pot ... All he had to do was mention it and movements were vitalized at the state level.  

    So yeah, sign away.  The more often, the better. And keep talking.

    I repeat: screw the obstructionists.

    Taking the road less traveled since 1967 .

    by Paragryne on Sat Apr 19, 2014 at 07:54:03 AM PDT

    •  Thanks . . (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Paragryne

      but how do we encourage the President to forge ahead and  that we are really tired of the petty tantrums of the right?  Does he understand that progressives will back him 100%?  It should be on issues that are middle America's issues and not those of the wall street crooks and corporate welfare sucks..

      Banks will only lend you money if you can prove you don't need it.

      by olegar on Sat Apr 19, 2014 at 10:34:16 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well, maybe we could start (0+ / 0-)

        by contacting the White House and letting him know that we do have his back, initiating petitions at Whitehouse.gov, through ActBlue, MoveOn, Organizing For Action, even Dailykos, write letters or correspond with Reid, Pelosi or other Democrats if your own representatives are obstructionist or Republican. Write letters to the Editor of major newspapers.  Demand it. If demands (see Shutdown) can be made of us by politicians who have no right or authority to demand anything from the people they serve, we can demand things too.

        We need to make more noise than the opposition by any means necessary.  I'm in.  We are the majority, after all.

        Taking the road less traveled since 1967 .

        by Paragryne on Sat Apr 19, 2014 at 12:29:00 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Keep in mind that most legal scholars believe that (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Paragryne

      the President can only issue executive orders as authorized by the Constitution of by existing law. He can't make up laws out of whole cloth.
        I say "most" legal scholars because G.W. Bush and his acolytes expressed the belief that the "unitary executive" did indeed have legislative power independent of Congress.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site