Skip to main content

Yesterday, the Obama administration complied with a Court order requiring release of the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo justifying the assassination without charge or trial of American citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki. (My first impressions are here.)

The New York Times editorial board was correctly and commendably critical:

. . . the memo turns out to be a slapdash pastiche of legal theories — some based on obscure interpretations of British and Israeli law — that was clearly tailored to the desired result. Perhaps the administration held out so long to avoid exposing the thin foundation on which it based such a momentous decision.

The memo's analysis of domestic law is equally troubling. The authors - now federal judge David Barron and Georgetown Law professor Marty Lederman rely heavily on a "public authority" justification to rationalize killing al-Awlaki with no support in statute or common law. The authors admit there's "little case law in which courts have analyzed the scope of the justification with respect to the conduct of government officials," and what case law the authors do acknowledged is dispensed with quickly in a footnote.

Rather than base its conclusions on case law (from the courts) or statute (from Congress), the memo relies on the Model Penal Code, which it argues supports the conclusion that a "public authority" justification can excuse state-sponsored killing without charge or trial, much less a conviction, because it permits a justification for public officers where the law requires or authorizes certain conduct. (Such as a fire truck speeding to a fire). At the outset, such an argument certainly doesn't change the fact that no law specifically authorizes a targeted killing and several federal statutes and international laws specifically forbid it. Worse, the memo paints the Model Penal Code's recognition of a "public authority" justification as far broader than it actually is. When read in its entirety, the Model Penal Code specifies that law enforcement officers may only use lethal force in the context of making an arrest. Regardless, the Model Penal Code is not law.

Ockham's Razor dictates that the memo's legal analysis reads like a foregone conclusion because al-Awlaki's targeting for death was a foregone conclusion. The New York Times rightly recognized that the memo was "tailored to the desired result." Consider also, as Marcy Wheeler deftly points out, the date of the memo  - July 16, 2010 - months after al-Awlaki was first placed on the kill list and after it became public. It was also just weeks before the ACLU filed suit to have al-Awlaki taken off the list.

Taking a step back from the memo on al-Awlaki's targeting, the drone program's legality, effectiveness, and morality as a whole must be seriously questioned, and far more critically questioned than OLC has done. Thousands of people have been killed by drone strikes, some of which are so-called "signature strikes" based on analysis of cell-phone tracking data. The government defines any (apparently) adult male in a strike zone as a "militant," a characterization that drastically underestimates the number of civilians killed.

The al-Awlaki memo is a sliver of transparency justifying the assassination by drone of one person, and, like the torture memos before it, the al-Awlaki memo will not withstand public scrutiny.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site