Skip to main content

Yesterday, the Abdullah Abdullah campaign demanded of the United Nations, that Abdullah win the election for president of Afghanistan. The campaign gave the UN until today to do this.

“If by tomorrow morning our demands . . . are not accepted, our patience has ultimately run out,” said Manawi, who has been who was tasked by Abdullah with monitoring the recount.

U.S.-brokered accord to salvage Afghan presidential election faces new problems, Washington Post

The United Nations is in the unusual position of being able to determine the winner of a national election, because of the unusual nature of the U.S.-negotiated agreement between the two unelected candidates, for how one of them might now be elected.
"The 12 July agreement reached between Dr. Abdullah Abdullah and Dr. Ashraf Ghani required that the two campaigns have joint oversight of the audit," said U.N. envoy Jan Kubis. "It is highly unusual for the parties in an electoral contest to be given such prominence in designing the procedures to audit its results or to have such a hands-on role in the actual physical auditing."

Afghanistan Presidential Vote Audit Hampered by Abdullah No-Show, Wall Street Journal

The Abdullah campaign has been highly successful in negotiating concessions, via the threat of civil war. Beyond just issues of how the election audit would be conducted, a unity government, a power-sharing arrangement, with a change to the structure of the Afghan government was agreed on, though the details of the unity agreement are disputed.

Negotiations about the agreement about the governance of Afghanistan have been conducted partly through a wild flurry of leaks to American newspapers.

Balkh governor Atta Mohammed Noor had once again threatened civil war, if Abdullah is not elected, via the Washington Post.

A powerful Afghan governor and former militia leader, who had threatened mass protests in the wake of the disputed presidential runoff in June, warned Wednesday of a “civil uprising” if the ongoing ballot recount proves biased and his candidate, Abdullah Abdullah, is not named the winner.

Key Abdullah ally warns of Afghan unrest if vote recount is ‘one-sided’, Washington Post

About which, an unnamed coterie of powerful Afghan officials had countered with a threat of a coup, via the New York Times.
A coterie of powerful Afghan government ministers and officials with strong ties to the security forces are threatening to seize power if an election impasse that has paralyzed the country is not resolved soon.

Amid Election Impasse, Calls in Afghanistan for an Interim Government, New York Times

For reporting this story, New York Times reporter Matt Rosenberg was ejected from Afghanistan, by the Karzai administration.

The Abdullah campaign then pressed for stronger audit standards, again via the New York Times.

Those officials said that the fraud had been directed by a coterie of presidential aides and ministers and managed in each province by government, election and security officials.

In Afghan Election, Signs of Systemic Fraud Cast Doubt on Many Votes, New York Times

The standards pressed for via New York Times included statistical invalidation of results, rather than statistical selection for scrutiny.
One time-tested way to reject fraud is to throw out any ballot box that shows an overwhelming percentage for one candidate — 95 percent, for example.

If applied to the runoff, a trigger of 93 percent of votes in a polling station in favor of one candidate, which was advocated by the Abdullah team, would have removed one-third of the ballots, more than two million, from the count, according to a diplomat in Kabul.

In Afghan Election, Signs of Systemic Fraud Cast Doubt on Many Votes, New York Times

Having pressed its views, via New York Times article, the Abdullah campaign then used what the New York Times article said, to press its views.
The campaign also seized upon a New York Times report last week citing unnamed Western analysts who said they believed Ghani had committed enough fraud to win the election. Those officials said that the fraud had been directed by a coterie of presidential aides and ministers and managed in each province by government, election and security officials.

Abdullah withdraws from Afghan election review, Stars and Stripes

Which pretty much brings us back to where this diary begins, that the Abdullah campaign had demanded of the UN, yesterday, that the Abdullah should win the election.

The UN has not met the demand of the Abdullah campaign, so the campaign has once again walked away from the election process.

American and United Nations officials scrambled to salvage Afghanistan’s bitterly contested presidential election on Wednesday, after one candidate, Abdullah Abdullah, decided to boycott the internationally brokered audit of the vote.

American diplomats met with Mr. Abdullah in an effort to persuade him to continue negotiations aimed at forming a national unity government, according to aides to Mr. Abdullah.

Afghan Unity Government Effort in Doubt as Candidate Boycotts Election Audit, New York Times

Reuters says that this continued threat of civil war in Afghanistan, the interminable chaos there, the high potential for violence, is all very embarrassing.

Interminable chaos as Western forces pull out would be a huge embarrassment for those countries which have spent billions of dollars and lost about 3,500 soldiers in a bid to bring peace and stability.

Afghan candidate threatens to pull out of election process, Reuters

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks for your continuing coverage... (9+ / 0-)

    ...of this cluster muck.  What exactly was gained by the 66,000 extra troops the Obama administration ordered into Afghanistan in the double surge of 2009?

    Don't tell me what you believe, show me what you do and I will tell you what you believe.

    by Meteor Blades on Wed Aug 27, 2014 at 02:04:32 PM PDT

    •  what is/was gained, MB, is continued profit (0+ / 0-)

      for the coprophagenscorporations and the shareholders thereof,  which is, of course,  the very apotheosis of human endeavor and the correct function of government.

      Any time our soldiers are deployed,  someone is making a buck.

      Afghanistan?  Just another piece of the Bush legacy we get to clean up after,  but quite frankly, I don't actually think those savages are worth another drop of American Blood and Treasure.

      don't always believe what you think

      by claude on Wed Aug 27, 2014 at 06:34:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Correct me if I'm wrong (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Garrett, anshmishra, native, capelza

    but I think that Jackson got 95% against JQ Adams in many regions. The result was that Adams won all of the states his father won, but that Jackson picked up all of the new territories, and by huge margins.

    95% margins aren't unheard of, especially in areas as tribal as Afghanistan.

    … the NSA takes significant care to prevent any abuses and that there is a substantial oversight system in place,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California), said August 23.

    by mosesfreeman on Wed Aug 27, 2014 at 02:11:59 PM PDT

    •  Yeah. (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mosesfreeman, native, capelza

      I haven't been very neutral in this diary, about the candidates. Some of the other diaries are more balanced.

      But given today's news, singling one candidate out seems fair.

      If this is a real standard for invalidating results, not just selecting results for scrutiny, I've never seen it:

      One time-tested way to reject fraud is to throw out any ballot box that shows an overwhelming percentage for one candidate — 95 percent, for example.
  •  That whole hemisphere has turned (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Garrett, native, capelza

    …into our local Pottery Barn.

  •  There isn't any 'fair' way to resolve this... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Garrett, capelza

    at least in the sense of sorting out valid ballots from fraudulent ones in order to determine a true, legitimate winner.

    The power-sharing agreement brokered by Biden also seems to be a bit shaky, to say the least.

    Looks like this likely isn't going to end well.

    About all we can hope for is to get our troops out before the serious shooting starts.

    And leave the door open for the Taliban.

    Sounds a bit like the Soviet withdrawal in the early 90's, which was followed by a few years of civil war and then along came the Taliban.

    Was there ever any real hope that history wouldn't repeat itself?

    About all we can do now is try to make sure Americans aren't getting killed while the Afganis settle their differences the way they've always done.

    Cheers.

    Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. Friedrich Schiller

    by databob on Wed Aug 27, 2014 at 05:37:53 PM PDT

  •  I think (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Garrett

    I think it's likely that AA won the election without cheating, but not sure how it will ever be proved. There should have been proper oversight, but I actually think the US was wanting to throw it to the other candidate, anyway.

    I don't know how I'm meant to act with all of you lot. Sometimes I don't try, I just na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na

    by Zornorph on Wed Aug 27, 2014 at 09:46:34 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site