I trust many of you guys have seen the new poll results:
In a reversal of a recent slump, Hillary Clinton rose among Democratic voters in a new CNN/ORC national poll out Monday morning, widening the gap between herself and Bernie Sanders. And if Vice President Joe Biden decides against running for the presidency, her advantage could rise even further.
Clinton picked up 42 percent, with Sanders grabbing 24 percent and Biden, who has not made a decision about running, with 22 percent. Other candidates polled within the margin of error. But if Biden elects not to run, Clinton's lead over Sanders jumps to 57 percent to 28 percent, up from 48 percent to 32 percent in the previous CNN poll
Aside from Hillary's huge record of accomplishment, she has beaten the Summer of Bring-Down-Clinton!
But then again, this shouldn't be a surprise to many. Look at what Bill went thru, yet he still beat Dole very decisively in 1996, despite Whitewater, etc. Hillary's emails are clearly things the American people and Democratic voters need not care about, just like a lame land deal. Its time for the media to start looking at the issues. She is the one who will preserve Obamacare, make education affordable for all Americans, and make America even greater than it currently is.
We do not need any more "choices." We have five good candidates in Hillary, as well as Bernie, Martin, Jim, and Lincoln. Joe Biden would only embarrass himself by running, given his miserable Presidential campaign record (he got zero delegates in 1988 and 2008). It would sow discontent where there needn't be any.
Go Hillary!
2:01 PM PT: about the "under 50 year old" thing: Compare the numbers for 50+ with the total/final numbers and you will see the impact of the under 50 crowd. I'm not saying the 49 and under numbers are large; but they certainly exist in this poll, even if they are not included in the age demo breakdowns near the end of the report.
On page 11, Clinton shows 57% total but 64% for 50+. Sanders has 28% total but 21% for 50+. If no one over 50 was polled, those pairs of numbers would be identical (ie Clinton's total and her 50+ number would be the same). The fact that the pairs of numbers do not match suggests (proves?) there were significant numbers of under 50 respondents.