This criticism is a glass house attack.
www.flackcheck.org/…
Audiences assume that an attack indicates a distinction. Why, otherwise, would an ad assert that an opponent is unqualified because he or she supported the attacked bill or behavior? In a surprising number of instances, political ads attack an opponent for a behavior, position or vote that the attacker has made as well. Those making such attacks are like the proverbial person who lives in a glass house but nonetheless throws stones.
It’s logically axiomatic that if Republicans already won’t work With Barack Obama and even conspired to do this:
Republican leaders will pretty much refuse to cooperate with ANY democrat or really ANY president that isn’t a Republican themselves.
ANY OTHER CONCLUSION CONSIDERING THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IS UNWARRANTED.
So you are Acting as though a practical concern is that Republicans won’t work wtih a Self described socialist So Vote for Hillary. The problem with that Logic is that Republicans won’t work With hillary either. For Fuck sake if BLOOMBERG won as an independent they wouldn’t work with him.
Bipartisanship to them means we capitulate. it’s really that simple. They consider “middle ground” and “compromise” treason. Any degree of reaching across the aisle to work with us at all will destroy t heir credibility with their base. They won’t work with any of us.
You need to wake up and smell the coffee, if you don’t agree with me you clearly don’t live in the real world.
Your entire premise seems to be framed on the basis that there is Gridlock in Washington and a Republican congress won’t work with an Avowed socialist. But this premise is fatally flawed as this is not a distinction between Hillary or Bernie. They’re both in the same boat where that is concerned. Republicans will Obstruct Bernie, and they’ll obstruct Hillary all the same.
If you don’t understand this I’m sorry but you’re just WRONG. and You know what?
if you do nominate her just don’t be shocked when I tell you I TOLD YOU SO when they start to Treat her EXACTLY The same as they would Bernie.
if you want to draw a Contrast between the candidates you should use something ONE is guilty of but the other is not equally so.
You have not done that with this one and your MEME is BAD and you should FEEL BAD for making this point. STOP DOING IT.
if there was a snowballs chance in hell they’d work with Hillary but not Bernie they would already be working with Obama.
Wake up.