Jill Stein claims, "If you have to lose an election in order to establish your power, you have to do that."
I love it when someone like Jill Stein calls for a revolution in which their own life and comfort is NOT AT RISK. This type of attitude reads to me like, “If it can’t be a flawless, pure and perfect representation of my opinion, then people other than me should die for the cause.” Call me intolerant, but I hate fundamentalism and the quest for ideological purity.
How many women's deaths, with the loss of Planned Parenthood and the Affordable Care Act under Trump, would it take to extinguish the raging fire of Jill Stein's willful ignorance?
Are we to ignore the catastrophic and long term risks to the environment that Trump poses?
Since when is the elimination of all environmental regulation an acceptable outcome?
Using the words "green party" doesn't make you a candidate for the environment.
This so called "green party" gave climate denial a political beach head, with eight years of lawyers rewriting scientific studies and environmental devastation under Bush. The so called “green party” now presents us with yet another, short sighted, self-important and environmentally destructive candidate, who mouths meaningless platitudes in a quest for ideological purity, in defense of making the same mistake again.
Jill Stein needs to walk through the dying forests and past the disappearing glaciers of California with me, and then explain to me how 4 or 8 years of Trump could be anything but a complete and total disaster.
When did the "Green Party" become partners with anti-science climate change deniers like Trump?
Willfully losing this election by aiding Donald Trump establishes nothing, and is a gross abdication of responsibility which would trade death and environmental destruction (from which there is no recovery) for an opportunity to assign blame. You can't eat or breath or drink blame.
Jill Stein is a traitor to the environmental causes she claims to support and deserves not one person's vote.