The real question of source accuracy as well as origins has yet to be answered as Craig Murray has proven to be a gadfly in the identification of alleged DNC whistle blowers much as WikiLeaks chose definite sides in its campaign to provide 2016 election information. The strategy of tension’s disinformation campaign continues.
Robert Mackey of The Intercept website wrote in August: “The WikiLeaks Twitter feed has started to look more like the stream of an opposition research firm working mainly to undermine Hillary Clinton than the updates of a non-partisan platform for whistleblowers.”
www.theguardian.com/...
Considering the skeeviness of the entire affair so far, it’s less than the mystery of Watergate’s Deep Throat as it might be some other deep orifice in the 21st Century. We’ll know more when Murray asks for asylum in a Trump Hotel/Tower, and gets protected by SecEd Betsy DeVos’s relative, Erick Prince (Academi LLC (formerly Xe and Blackwater Worldwide)).
A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
U.S. intelligence officials have reportedly told members of Congress during classified briefings that they believe Russians passed the documents on to Wikileaks as part of an influence operation to swing the election in favor of Donald Trump.
But Murray insisted that the DNC and Podesta emails published by Wikileaks did not come from the Russians, and were given to the whistleblowing group by Americans who had authorized access to the information.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.