Something that never felt right may end up being explained through the Senate Intelligence Committee. How did most polling show Clinton ahead in key States and then within a narrow time frame see those same numbers tighten up, not flip, but then she loses State? We’ve talked about Polling, we’ve talked about ignoring the Rust Belt, not delivering issue’s related to region, but none of this explains the flip. She technically should have been doing shitty the whole time in those States. Yet here we have this statement made today at the podium by Senator Warner:
CBS Evening NewsVerified account @CBSEveningNews
Intel chairman says Russia hired more than 1000 hackers to create fake, anti-Clinton news in key states, won by Trump. @jeffpeguescbs,
Concentrated propaganda , targeting specific voters ( speculation on voters), which if stories are fit to region, promote the kind of hatred and distrust we’ve seen in this election, would not only be effective to change votes but possibly drive voters to the booth. And I can’t help but add, if this were true and you add the Comey letter, basically it reaffirms your belief.
“Mr. Warner drew attention to reports of perhaps 1,000 internet trolls in Russia generating fake news stories and targeting them at swing states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. “Russia’s goal, Vladimir Putin’s goal, is a weaker United States,” he said.” NYTimes