Pondering on the recent posts about the destruction of Hillary article, I’ve come to the conclusion that a far more worthy use of our time is to consider the antidisestablishmentarianism of Hillary Clinton.
Dictionary.com defines the term as:
noun. opposition to the withdrawal of state support or recognition from an established church, especially the Anglican Church in 19th-century England. Origin of antidisestablishmentarianism Expand. anti- + disestablishment + -arian + -ism.
What this means is that ‘The antidisestablishmentarianism of Hillary Clinton’ is a complete non-sequitur and purposeful snark, because reading and writing about something so obtuse as that is as useful, if not more, than beating your heads against the wall in any of the 3 other pie-festa that use relevant words in their titles. And I don't even know if ‘antidisestablishmentarianism’ is the correct part of speech in a match with ‘destruction.'
A quote from Cicero is quite irrelevant to the situation of multiple shit shows that we see happening right now over this most recent fight:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam volutpat sapien imperdiet malesuada consectetur. Quisque quis vulputate purus. Nullam congue tincidunt massa et consequat. Curabitur eget lobortis ligula, vel maximus diam. Maecenas ac metus pellentesque, posuere erat quis, scelerisque turpis. Proin suscipit eu lectus quis porta. Proin sodales aliquam turpis.
Here is a
cat:
I encourage all of you who avoided those predictable messes on the wreck list to use the comments section to sped your valuable time on discussions just as useful as those comment threads turned out to be, including:
1. Who really killed JFK?
2. How did the Warriors blow a 3-1 lead in last year’s NBA finals?
3. Why do Kyrie Irving and B.o.B believe the earth is flat?
4. Are mechanical toothbrushes really worth it?
Thank you for reading.