The director general of the United Nations' International Organization for Migration is responsible for coordinating assistance to migrants around the world. So of course, the occupier of the Oval Office has chosen Ken Isaacs, a guy who has regularly pushed anti-Muslim social media posts, "including claims that Muslims were trying to impose Sharia law in the US."
After his nomination was announced, The Washington Post reported that Isaacs had made disparaging remarks about Muslims and suggested Islam was inherently a violent religion on social media. Isaacs apologized at the time, telling the Post that he "deeply" regretted his comments, and added, "I pledge to hold myself to the highest standards of humanity, human dignity and equality if chosen to lead IOM."
KFile's subsequent review turned up tweets not identified in the Post report that shed more light on his anti-Muslim views, including pushing claims from fringe, anti-Muslim groups and individuals.
He was at it as recently as January, when he "retweeted anti-Muslim activist Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy, who tweeted out an article encouraging Trump to take on the Muslim Brotherhood, which Gaffney wrote 'has been working patiently, stealthily with the stated purpose' of destroying America from within." In December, he retweeted anti-Muslim activist Robert Spencer, who was defending Trump's retweeting of anti-Muslim videos by Britain First. That's just the most recent of his deplorableness—he's been at it since at least 2015.
While it's tradition for the U.N. group to select the candidate from the U.S. to hold the top job, it does have to be confirmed by a two-thirds votes of the membership of the group. Seems unlikely to happen this time around. That's one deplorable selection likely to be thwarted. Unfortunately not all of them can be blocked.