Certainly not hunters. One of the arguements the NRA and other pro mass murder groups is they need their guns for hunting. Well sorry folks, the number of hunters has been steadily declining for decades. According to this story,
In rural Wisconsin, the passion for hunting still appears to burn as bright as the blaze orange jackets you'll see stalking through fields or clambering up into trees during deer season. But stop into a meat processing center or a sporting goods store, ask about it at a bar or a hunting shack and you'll hear from people like Wrasse: Fewer people are hunting. "It's just kind of fading away," he says.
A new survey by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shows that today, only about 5 percent of Americans, 16 years old and older, actually hunt. That's half of what it was 50 years ago and the decline is expected to accelerate over the next decade.
While the gist of the article deals with the decline of revenue through decline of hunting licenses, it provides a insight into the fallacy of the argument that guns are for hunting.
An assault style rifle rifle is not a hunting rifle, full stop. It is not a self defense weapon. The only purpose of an assualt style weapon is to kill humans, and the dream of the Rambo wanna be is just that, to kill another human being.
As a VN combat veteran I stand by the the March For Our Lives movement and Veterans For Gun Reform. No one needs an assault style rifle.
To answer the title question, they’re fucking nuts.