Each of us has our own opinion as to the rigor with which we ought to pursue an investigation to confirm that there was no e-voting fraud/hacking.
For those who do advocate pursuing the investigation rigorously, there is the problem of gaining traction for the idea, especially in the mainstream media and Democratic party.
Here is a possible solution for gaining traction. There is a critical distinction between: investigating whether or not BUSHCO hacked the election, and investigating whether or not SOMEONE hacked the election.
It is easier to advocate the latter, as it is less accusatory. Furthermore, that SOMEONE may be a terrorist, e.g., Bin Laden. Therefore we can
Re-frame the movement to guarantee auditable US elections as part of the National Security debate.
For example, imagine the difference in Georgia, where voting is 100% electronic, with no paper trail. Either:
(a) Go to the legislature and demand voter verified paper trails in 2006, so that the Republicans and Diebold Pioneers cannot steal the election;
(b) Go to the legislature and demand voter verified paper trails in 2006, so that Bin Laden cannot destroy our US freedoms and democracy, which he hates so much.
No prizes for guessing which of (a) or (b) a Republican Georgian legislature is more likely to go for.
[For new dkos users: if you'd like to help get this Auditable Elections = Part of War On Terror frame out there, click the Recommend button over there on the right. Some mainstream media and Dem people are known to peruse the dkos recommended diaries on occasion.]