Do the Neo-Conservatives, who have unfortunately demonstrated how far they are willing to go to seize and maintain power, have the audacity to sit on the Foleygate as a red herring for their own latent advantage?
Wether or not the Bush administration had advanced knowledge of 9-11, wether or not Cheney was running wargames simulating the events of september 11th on the morning of 9-11 (which allowed them to happen, due to a complete lack of fighter cover), there is a chance that they wanted Foleygate to happen just now.
Follow me down the rabbit hole below the fold, and decide for yourself.
Hypothetically speaking, if another major(nuclear) terrorist attack were to happen during a democratically controlled house and senate sometime between fall of 2006 and fall 2008, wouldn't it be the perfect justification for the Repugnicans to gain all 3 branches again?
Would the fallout, (pun intended), be so bad as to politically parallel the Reichstag crisis in Germany?
I wouldn't put it past Cheney, Rove, Rummy and the rest of the PNAC crew to set that up.
They've already got all the tyrannical, authoritative laws they need to gain absolute control over the nation in such a situation.
So, the question is this.
Would Rove, knowing full well that mainstream america was swinging left, fuel that to intentionally lose the November elections?
Would he have gotten that Republican staffer to leak those emails intentionally? Knowing full well it would create a firestorm?