Now the accuser is saying, after ten months, that one of the three suspects refused to participate. Maybe she and that scumbag Nifong are trying to deal with the fact that Seligman has an ironclad alibi.
http://www.nytimes.com/...
Maybe she and that scumbag Nifong are trying to deal with the fact that Seligman has an ironclad alibi.
http://www.nytimes.com/...
Everything significant this woman has said, and everything significant Nifong has said, has turned out to be a lie. She now says no penis penetrated her, and she now says there were only two men. In addition, her timeline has been revised, which, if believed, would mean that she hung around at the house for more than an hour after the "attack." Nifong, for his part, has still failed to explain why he actively concealed from the defense, over a period of many weeks, his DNA guys' finding of semen from several men, none of whom were members of the Duke lacrosse team, in the accuser.
When will the local judicial system act to remove this craven and corrupt prosecutor from the case and hopefully from office?
It is obvious that the accuser and Nifong are cooperating to keep this case alive, or at least to allow it to die as slowly as possible. Maybe she is waiting for a book offer-- I am certain that he now fears for his future as a prosecutor.
With any luck, they will run off together.
I have yet to see from Kossacks one one-hundredth of the interest in the complete unravelling of this case that I saw when three rich(?) white college boys were in the dock for raping a black woman. How our prejudices define us, indeed.