Today TIME Magazine hit a new bottom, even outdoing their recent story about "Why we should teach the Bible in school," by running an article suggesting that incest should be legalized. Their justification? If sodomy is legalized by Lawrence v. Texas, incest should be legalized too.
But of course, a piece of shit article like this wouldn't be complete without a quote from everyone's favorite Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia.
"State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are ... called into question by today's decision," wrote Justice Antonin Scalia, in a withering dissent he read aloud page by page from the bench.
That's right, they even included Scalia echoing Rick Santorum by suggesting that if gays can have sex, then men can bone dogs...b/c we all know that Fido consented to Righteous Rick going to town on him.
Yah, TIME is right, there is no difference between gay sex and incest. The impact of gay sex is....gays having sex. The impact of incest is....I don't know, retarded children; siblings being coerced by their parents into marrying each other; and kids being "punished" by Daddy in slightly more devastating fashion.