The argument made by Hillary Clinton that experience is the sole, ultimate and all-important criteria for President is illogical.
Barack Obama should counter with this simple response:
"If experience is the sole criteria for the Presidency, the public would be clamoring for George W. Bush to have a third term. We can all agree that the public would rather have a President with good judgment than four more years of George W. Bush."
Any other thoughts about how to combat the experience line of reasoning?