Another proud moment in unipartisanship, brought to us by none other than Chuck Schumer:
Lincoln was embraced by her colleagues on the Senate floor as a conquering general returning from war. Sen. Bob Menendez (N.J.), in charge of the Senate Democrats' campaign effort, gave her a hug and a kiss and said, "Now we just have to raise money." Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) held up two fists and said of her primary campaign: "Fighting Wall Street with one hand, unions with the other."
Chuck thinks the unions brought about the economic collapse? He thinks they caused the redistribution of wealth? The consolidation of banks? The loss of lending?
Since there is no accountability, my questions are rhetorical. In all seriousness, how can he be so certain the base has absolutely no value? The Lincoln/Halter race was close.
We can all be sure that Wall Street will come through with the money Blanche needs, and she'll lose anyway.
From the comments:
Must be erroneous reporting
Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) held up two fists and said of her primary campaign: "Fighting Wall Street with one hand, unions with the other."
Naw. That should've been:
held up one open palm with one hand and a middle finger in the other hand and said of her primary campaign: "Dealing with Wall Street with one hand, unions with the other."
Guess which hand did what?
by h bridges on Thu Jun 10, 2010 at 02:37:45 PM CDT