I have a feeling the debate over the #Occupy movement is about to shift into high gear in the national media, and one of the main points of discussion will be the takeover of a building (i.e. "private property") in Oakland.
The media will likely start asking questions like... Why did the protesters take over private property? Does this justify the police actions? Does it discredit the movement?
How to answer those questions I'm not exactly sure, but I think this message will be part of the answer: [Disclaimer: I was directed to this link via Twitter and cannot vouch for the authenticity/accuracy of it, but I'm feel pretty confident it is legitimate]
The Oakland branch of the Traveler's Aid Society was a government-funded non-profit that provided aid to houseless people in our area. After the government cut funding to the program the Oakland branch faced foreclosure at the hands of their private lender.
Since then, the space sat vacant, as though it were disposable to those with the keys. To us this space is invaluable. We are reclaiming it for the people. It is now open for our use.
We welcome the Traveler's Aid Society to resume providing services in this building. Otherwise, we will make it into a library and open workshop space for the people of Oakland.
This space is an example for the country. When the political and financial systems of this nation fail to provide needed services, we must do it ourselves.
SOURCE: http://lockerz.com/...