Since Saturday when Santorum accused the above two of collusion, it seems that several credible news outlets have been reviewing the repblican debates and have concluded Santorum is correct.
The Washington Post, the Examiner and other news outlet found that Paul attacked Romney's other opponents over 30 times and in Michigan, where Paul is not in the contest, his campaign is running an ad for Romney. An article today, says these two talk several times a day.
My point is this, the 1st republican debate occurred on May 5, 2011. These two had to be in cahoots before that, as Paul has never attacked Romney.
Now Paul, this afternoon, is saying it is not "exactly a strategic alliance". How is it no one noticed this before now? Romney is really smart and Paul is really naive if he believes his supporters voting for Romney would guarantee he gets whatever he bargained for. This is totally dishonest and deceptive on both their parts. Paul threw his supporters time and money under the bus, so he could get something only for himself and/or his son. Total lowlifes.