You are in trying times. But, that's redundant; though hardly the sum of your long history. Do you know? The supposed shifts in the U.S. and world demographics will do little or nothing to change that fact. Please passover a false sense of homeland security. White. Brown. Black. Solidarity. Finally, a chance to make it right. Is demographic shift as significant as ideological orientation? Ignorance is. How many cultures immigrate here and know nothing of substance about how your mortal commitment to Civil Rights helped them achieve the American dream? That your and your ancestors' lives and deaths are the reason they are not strange fruit. Model “minorities.” Hungry for a chance to dream. Indeed. On what grounds do you build solidarity? With whom? When? Where? Why? Whose agenda is first, this time around? Try something different—pick you, by name. Permission makes poor strategy? “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." - Frederick Douglass. (Read more below...)
And then. Ammunition and unwavering commitment to violent domination is a population equalizer, or so post-contact history suggests. You've seen. If you now know that the European population is decreasing worldwide, power brokers have known for some time, and have planned for it in advance. Elections. Panic, Exponentially. War and Capacity Destruction. Northern Hemisphere Alliances. Policy.
The world is and has always been a predominately black-brown place. White imperialists know this and knew what to do with/about it, toward their ends. Color-based caste systems to de-unify (disintegrate) indigenous people. Suppression of the pre-colonization history of prosperous indigenous civilizations. Denying ancient intercultural trade and cultural mingling. A people with no history. Shall we mention genocide? Remember.
They, the “great” explorers/conquerors of old and modern-day “democracy” givers, have simply been more persistently ready, willing, and equipped to use violence to achieve and maintain their chosen interests…their (and their allies) prosperity at the world’s expense. As William F. Buckley’s National Review (a sainted conservative [conserving what?] mouthpiece) relevantly stated before,
“The central question that emerges—and it is not a parliamentary question or a question that is answered by merely consulting a catalog of the rights of American citizens, born Equal—is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes—the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race.
National Review believes that the South's premises are correct. If the majority wills what is socially atavistic, then to thwart the majority may be, though undemocratic, enlightened. It is more important for any community, anywhere in the world, to affirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority. Sometimes it becomes impossible to assert the will of a minority, in which case it must give way; and the society will regress; sometimes the numerical minority cannot prevail except by violence: then it must determine whether the prevalence of its will is worth the terrible price of violence. (Editorial, National Review (1957-08-24).” - Wikiquote: http://en.wikiquote.org/....
It would seem some answers haven’t changed. What questions are you posing?