I don't know how I ended up there, but I just stumbled onto this: National Review article "Obama's Earth Day Travels Will Generate 868 Tons of Carbon."
There really wasn't any point to the article except to talk about how much more carbon Obama was going to be dumping in the air than most other people, but what the author seemed not to realize that by pointing it out, he was making a big deal out of the fact, and, that, therefore implied that he was concerned about it . . .
So which is it? Human activity affects the environment or not? If it doesn't, what's the big deal? If it is important, then the National Review has to turn in its climate change denial creds.