Sad but not really surprising: www.nytimes.com/...
When some two dozen New Yorkers filed into a Manhattan courthouse this week to finish out their grand jury service, the case against a man who would have been the world’s most prominent criminal defendant was no longer before them.
That man, Donald J. Trump, was facing potential criminal charges from the grand jury this year over his business practices. But in the weeks since the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, stopped presenting evidence to the jurors about Mr. Trump, new signs have emerged that the former president will not be indicted in Manhattan in the foreseeable future — if at all.
At least three of the witnesses once central to the case have either not heard from the district attorney’s office in months, or have not been asked to testify, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
I guess you don’t need protection from prosecution if you own the prosecutor?
Seems like it was a slam dunk to the causal observer. Trump and the Trump Org were involved in a criminal scheme to defraud both financial companies and tax authorities.
Some one needs to explain why. Maybe it is time to investigate Bragg. What do Dunne and Pomerantz say? Did the grand jury not reach a conclusion, or were they not even asked??