Instead of doing
this, why don't they put that money towards, oh, I don't know...
fixing the security problems with their software?!?!?!
Could it be that it's part of their money-making scheme to release software with more holes in it than a man with a porcupine fetish, thereby trapping the end-user in a loop of never-ending upgrades, patches, and technical support if that user wants anything resembling a secure system? No, that couldn't be the reason...