Skip to main content

Trolling around for something else he thinks might be a good cudgel against President Obama.
Although he hasn't made a decision yet, Rep. Darrell Issa is pondering a look at whether the Bureau of Labor Statistics is cooking jobs numbers. The California Republican, who has chaired the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform since Republicans regained the majority in the House of Representatives in 2010, gave Fox News the strong impression Wednesday that he buys into the conspiracy theory that BLS is making up numbers for partisan advantage, as the now-infamous Tweet by former GE CEO Jack Welch would have it.
Issa: The way it is being done with the constant revisions, significant revisions, tells us that it is not as exact science as it needs to be and there’s got to be a better way to get those numbers or don’t put them out if they’re going to be wrong by as much as half a point.

Fox: Now, Greta [van Susteren] asked him when he wants to have these hearings…and he said, that, “we very much intend to work every day through November and December to get these kind of things done. We’re hoping that this is a good nonpartisan time,” he said.

David Dayen, who predicted on Friday that Issa would investigate the BLS numbers, points out that Issa's committee already investigated the BLS's methods last summer. That effort seemed mostly aimed at tearing down the idea of "green jobs."

Anybody who takes the time to read BLS methodology, including all the caveats the bureau's statisticians attach to their numbers, already knows that there is at least as much art as science involved in determining on a monthly basis how many jobs are lost or gained. But in a world like Issa's, where revisions are seen as egregious errors instead of the incorporation of new and better information, there has to be something amiss and that something must be political manipulation.

The statisticians themselves point out, though few in the media or elsewhere seem to listen, that the monthly numbers have a margin of error of 100,000. In other words, those 114,000 jobs BLS said were created in September could be anywhere 14,000 to 214,000. That's not because the books are doctored. The system is transparent to anyone willing to take the time to look beyond the surface numbers.  

As Larry Mishel at the liberal Economic Policy Institute puts it in a fine piece exploring the nuances of the two surveys that go into making up each month's job report (and the reasons for the divergences between them):

This controversy is not funny at all. BLS career staff has been inundated with calls from people attacking them, the predictable consequence of these conspiracy charges. BLS staff should not be facing this type of harassment. This whole episode makes me angry—at the disrespect for facts and the professionals at BLS—and it also makes me sad about the state of discourse in our nation.
Issa says he hasn't decided what to do yet. So many possible investigations, so little time. But when you're Darrell Issa, you've got a mission—attracting media to focus on anydamnthing that could hurt the Obama administration. If he sees the possibility of achieving that, the BLS probe is probably a go. Getting at the truth doesn't really matter in such investigations. What counts is innuendo and insinuation. Opt for those often enough, Issa knows, and you can make yourself as influential as Rush Limbaugh.

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Thu Oct 11, 2012 at 11:28 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site