Today I read a diary that had snark boldly stated in the beginning . I am a older recoverying conservative who may not understand snark but I do understand distortions and lies..
So the diary was about Rush Limbaugh and the diarist took a monologue he did talking about how the left views the south and her citizens in his opinion. He is a ignorant demagogue who has a single minded purpose and he is not to be pitied. The diarist made it look like Rush was caught saying the south is full of ignorant hayseeds but what he was saying was what I,ve heard him say many times when I used to listen to him and thats the left looks down on the people of the south whether Rush believes this or not isnt important what is important is the diarist used Rush's own words out of context to make it look like Rush believed the Southerners were ignorant hayseeds and hopes I think to cause some attention to His words and hope some of his listeners will be convinced by the distortion and turn away from him and that would cause more harm to his empire.The ends never justify the means but the right believes they do and its one of the ways we are different from them and I believe if we start to use their ways to defeat them we than become like them and that should be avoided at all cost .I was thinking about HR-ing the diary to make that point but decided to debate in the comments string of the diary instead and write this diary in response..So readers was that the best way to deal with the situation or should I have HR-ed out of conscience?