Skip to main content

Recently a diary was dumped into our space by a group called Consumer Watchdog.  They post here regularly, dropping diaries on various topics and leaving without engaging in discussion.    The inflammatory title attracted immediate attention and immediate reaction:

I Support Planned Parenthood, Why Isn't Planned Parenthood Supporting Women?

In the course of the discussion several Kossacks, notably Eyesbright and wilderness voice, began to smell a fish.  Who are these people?  What do they want here?  Are they truly consumer advocates or are they just another astroturf shop that makes big bucks while pretending to serve the little guy?  

Come along below the gizmo and let's try and sort this out:  

Consumer Watchdog appears to be a fearsome group of activist lawyers who take on special interests and protect individuals from predatory corporations and intrusive government.  Their website is impressive:  well credentialed lawyers working on an array of seemingly progressive issues.  

So what's the beef?  Well, Consumer Watchdog, formerly known as the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, is a tireless advocate for transparency --everywhere except when their own business is concerned.  

According to Consumerwatchdogwatch.org they aren't a legitimate consumer group at all.

Consider these facts:

It claims to work for the public interest, but refuses to reveal who its funders are;
Rakes in millions of dollars for itself from a self-serving "intervenor fee" provision it inserted into a ballot initiative;
Has been fined by California's Fair Political Practices Commission for illegal actions;
Has a founder who has pocketed millions from the organization and its affiliates, and lives in a $1.75 million mansion; and
Is funneled money by special interests, including corporations, for its grandstanding and attacks.

A Democratic political consultant in Sacramento, Steve Maviglio, took to the pages of the SF Chronicle in an attempt to shine a light on Consumer Watchdog:
One source of Consumer Watchdog's financing is public record. Consumer Watchdog sprang from the loins of Voter Revolt, which gave us Proposition 103 and auto insurance reform in 1988. Organizations created by Prop. 103 author [and founder of Consumer Watchdog] Harvey Rosenfield have collected $7.8 million in intervenor fees since his measure passed, including $2.4 million in 2009 alone.

No other group has received any of these fees in years. (It's not clear why consumers need intervenors when there are lawyers, actuaries and analysts at the state Department of Insurance to protect our interests.) Meanwhile, Rosenfield has paid himself millions of dollars through nonprofits, including one organization whose only grant, according to IRS records, is a grant to another one of his organizations.

More recently, Consumer Watchdog pushed legislation that would regulate health insurance rates at the state level even though the federal government plans to do the same thing - with one critical difference. Federal law doesn't pay "intervenors," so Consumer Watchdog wrote a state law that promises juicy intervenor fees in California.

According to Maviglio, Consumer Watchdog strongly opposed the Affordable Care Act .

They were bashing Planned Parenthood over a disagreement on malpractice limits, but that is not all their new patient safety initiative proposes. It (PDF) requires mandatory random drug testing of doctors, requires doctors to inform on each other, and automatic suspension from practice upon test failure, pending a bureaucratic investigation, regardless of whether the doctor in question was taking painkillers for, say, a recent root canal.  Trying to capitalize on the failed war on drugs hysteria is hardly a progressive agenda.  

Given the lack of transparency of this organization, given that we don't know where their money comes from, given that they regularly drop diaries that read like PR promotions, given that they almost never engage in discussion with Kossacks, given their recent attack on Planned Parenthood, given all that and more, the question is:  why are they here?

9:15 AM PT: Thanks to Roadbed Guy we have another example of a dubious diary by Consumer Watchdog where several Kossacks smelled a rat.  Take a look at this link and ask yourself:  WTF?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site