Skip to main content

Oh, Texas Republicans.  You act like this is such a dark-red state, and then, well, you freak out when Democrats come up with a candidate for Governor who isn't a no-name.

Predictably, Republicans have taken to picking apart Wendy Davis's life story.  Well, perhaps with a hand from the state's major newspapers:

But the Dallas Morning News reported Sunday that Davis was 21 — not 19 as stated in her online Texas Senate biography —when her first marriage ended in divorce. Also, Davis and her daughter Amber lived only a few months in her family's mobile home
I am not sure what, exactly, the substance of this attack is.  So it turns out that Wendy Davis was separated from her first husband, not divorced, at 19 and the divorce wasn't finalized until she was 21.  (As a Texas attorney, yeah, I can tell you that that's a fairly normal timetable for a contested divorce.)  So... what's the problem here?

Oh, wait, but there's more:

Things got easier financially when she married her second husband, attorney Jeff Davis. His income helped raise Amber and the couple's daughter together, Dru, as well as pay for her to finish college and attend Harvard. Jeff Davis also kept the couple's two daughters while their mother was studying in Boston and, when the couple divorced in 2005, he won parental custody and she was ordered to pay child support, according to the newspaper
Get this: her (then) husband supported her and her daughters while she was finishing school.  Stop the presses.

I am not certain just why the Republicans think that this is a winning line of attack.  Are they trying to suggest that she's a liar for saying that she was a divorced mother at 19 (when in fact she was only separated)?  Or that she's a bad mom for having her (then) husband take care of the kids while she went to school?  The latter attack mostly just shows how out of touch Republicans are with the struggles of everyday Texas mothers, who often must make difficult choices when it comes to raising children and education or career advancement.  Some women are fortunate enough to have supportive husbands through all of this, but many unfortunately do not.

This line of attack seems more like the kind of thing that is only going to serve to humanize Davis.  And yes, Republicans are running scared: Wendy Davis outraised presumptive Republican nominee Greg Abbott in the second half of 2013, and around 85 percent of her contributions were in donations of $50 or less -- suggesting that she has broad support and isn't just raising money from a handful of large donors.  Republicans keep riling up the base by connecting Sen. Davis to out-of-state interests and President Obama's political operatives, in order to suggest that Texas Democrats are not concerned with ordinary Texans; yet this is only to obscure the fact that it is the Republicans who are far more interested in doing the bidding of out-of-state interests (like, say, the Kansas-based Koch brothers) and the vast majority of Davis's support is coming from within the state.

It is Texans who want change, not out-of-state interests.  And it is out-of-staters who worry that the last bastion of deep-red conservatism will flip.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site