Skip to main content

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) answers questions from reporters after the weekly Republican caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington March 11, 2014.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
Sen. Mitch McConnell's majority isn't a done deal, nor is his re-election.
In 2012, conservatives were convinced a Senate takeover was in the cards.
When Human Events last looked at the 35 states in which voters are choosing U.S. Senators this fall, we concluded that “Republicans are brimming with confidence about gaining at least the four seats they need” to turn the Senate’s present 53-to-47 seat Democratic edge into a GOP majority.

Nearly four months later, that confidence has clearly grown. Of those 35 Senate races, eighteen can be considered truly competitive. The seats of all seven retiring Democratic senators are in that category: Joseph Lieberman (Conn.), Daniel Akaka (Hawaii), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), Kent Conrad (N.D.), Jim Webb (Va.), and Herb Kohl (Wis.). In addition, no less than seven Democratic incumbent senators are facing spirited challenges from Republican opponents.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell put that year's takeover chances at 50-50, and the media dutifully reported about the difficulties for Democrats in that chamber. And they were legitimate difficulties. The map was tailor-made for Republican pickups, with tough seats from the Democratic landslide of 2006 up for grabs. Republicans ran hard on Obamacare, convinced the law's unpopularity would be the key to victory. Of course, we all know what happened—a projected Republican majority fizzled, and on Election Day Democrats celebrated the pickup of two seats.

So here we are again, a map just as crappy for Democrats in 2014 as it was in 2012, except that Republicans need six seats instead of four for the majority. Republicans just as confident as they were in 2012, and running on Obamacare. Again.

Please read below the fold for more on this story.

And there's no sugarcoating it. The map looks bad for Democrats! But does it look as bad as they think it does? Here's the current state of play: Republicans are looking solid in West Virginia, South Dakota, and Arkansas. We haven't seen good recent polling out of Montana, but we can safely assume that for now, Montana is on this list.

Democrats have real pickup opportunities in Georgia and Kentucky.

So control of the Senate will be decided by a series of tight contests in Alaska, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, and North Carolina.

States that aren't in play, despite what Republicans claim: Iowa, New Hampshire and Virginia. Give it a few months, and Colorado and Michigan will be in this group.

Republicans need six seats to take control of the chamber. They have a solid 3-4 seat headstart in that direction. So they need another 2-3 seats from the group that includes Alaska, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan and North Carolina. And that's assuming they don't lose either Georgia or Kentucky. That's also assuming they don't pull a Missouri and surrender pickup opportunities a la Todd Akin (I wouldn't make that assumption), or lose an easy-hold state a la Richard Mourdock (looking at you, Mississippi).

Is 2014 tough for Democrats? Yup. So was 2012. We've had to defend our gains from the wave 2006 and 2008 elections. If we could guarantee base turnout this year, we'd hold on safely. If our people vote, we win. But of course, that's easier said than done in these off-year elections. But worst-case scenario and Republicans take a narrow Senate majority, consider it a rental, because 2016 will be all ours.

Originally posted to kos on Thu Mar 27, 2014 at 08:39 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Sylv, dwellscho, Phoenix Woman, Radiowalla, Odysseus, Fabienne, Vico, eeff, janefordean, polecat, exNYinTX, dpeifer1949, missLotus, 88kathy, pucklady, Paradox13, Aquarius40, roses, ivote2004, oceanview, Cedwyn, wader, Redfire, SneakySnu, virginislandsguy, johanus, wdrath, defluxion10, bsegel, Brian82, imicon, Gowrie Gal, bloomer 101, democracy inaction, ajsuited, Gary Norton, majcmb1, coloradorob, tommymet, myboo, edwardssl, profundo, raptavio, koNko, arlene, SherriG, gpoutney, gimmie truth, chicating, blueoregon, Thinking Fella, Habitat Vic, puakev, yoduuuh do or do not, Dave in Northridge, sfbob, OIL GUY, Librarianmom, leonard145b, gizmo59, mconvente, JeffW, GAS, Youffraita, Involuntary Exile, bythesea, pamelabrown, statsone, legendmn, Bule Betawi, WakeUpNeo, Grey Panther, kat68, Bonsai66, followyourbliss, manucpa, RJH, joe from Lowell, Larsstephens, Railfan, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, Mokurai, FogCityJohn, estreya, cazcee, kenwards, ericlewis0, fiercefilms, stevenaxelrod, annieli, slowbutsure, AdamR510, Mr MadAsHell, BlueJessamine, UtahLibrul, mikejay611, Alice Olson, Nebraska68847Dem, PorridgeGun, thomask, BarackStarObama, IB JOHN, VTCC73, old mark, StratCat, jham710, allergywoman, Monsieur Georges, anodnhajo, Deep Texan, 2thanks, CA ridebalanced, kellius, reginahny, Arahahex, doroma, tn mountain girl, desert rain, IamGumby, koosah, Linda1961, poopdogcomedy, minnec, Aunt Pat, duhban, Lordcaradoc, sparkle75, The Marti, CFlaDem, Dodgerdog1, Capt Crunch, thanatokephaloides, hbk, AJayne, Le Champignon, TheDudester, numble

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site