Skip to main content

by Stephen Yellin

This is part of a series of daily articles that covers the run-up to the catastrophe of World War I in July 1914. The diplomatic crisis exactly 100 years ago was sparked by the murder of the main force for peace in the Austro-Hungarian Empire – Archduke Franz Ferdinand, together with his wife Sophie – by a Serbian terrorist. Backed by Germany’s offering of unconditional support in using force to retaliate against Serbia – the infamous “blank check” – the Viennese authorities began preparing a list of demands for the Serbian government to accept or face war. The demands were deliberately made to ensure war would occur.

The ultimatum was finally issued on July 23, 1914, over 3 weeks after the Archduke’s murder. The 12 days that followed are the focus of this series.

Feel free to refer to mylist of important figures in keeping track of who's who.

Previous days:
Thursday, July 23rd - the fuse is lit
Friday, July 24th - "c'est la guerre europeene"
Saturday, July 25th - "we stand upon the edge of war"
Sunday, July 26th - “War is thought imminent. Wildest enthusiasm prevails.”
Monday, July 27th – “You’ve cooked this broth and now you’re going to eat it.”
Tuesday, July 28 – “To try and avoid such a calamity as a European war”
----------------------------
Wednesday, July 29th – “I will not be responsible for a monstrous slaughter!”

Belgrade – the first shots fired

The previous day had seen Austria-Hungary declare war on Serbia through the unorthodox method of a publicly transmitted telegram. The government in Vienna, reacting to the news that Russia is beginning to mobilize in response, is receiving mixed messages from its ally in Berlin. Bethmann and Foreign Secretary Jagow, acting on orders from the Kaiser, have requested that the Austrian government open direct talks with the Russians while negotiating with Serbia to find an acceptable compromise to its ultimatum. At the same time, however those same officials, together with the German military, are urging their Austrian counterparts (Foreign Secretary Berchtold and General Conrad von Hotzendorf) to commence hostilities as soon as possible to short-circuit talks with St. Petersburg.

Accordingly, the Austrian government decides to stay the course and commences an artillery bombardment of Belgrade that afternoon. While the bombardment is relatively brief and causes little damage it still accomplishes what Berlin is looking for. Equally important is that it kills the remaining hopes that St. Petersburg and Vienna could diplomatically resolve the crisis. That General Conrad is banking on Germany coming to his armies’ aid is amply demonstrated by his order to mobilize the army along the Serbian border but not as of yet the Russian one. Without German mobilization the Russians would be free to invade Austrian-held Galicia (parts of modern-day, western Ukraine and southern Poland, including Krakow and Lvov) and strike towards Budapest.

Berlin – “who rules in Berlin – Bethmann or Moltke?”

Kaiser Wilhelm, meanwhile, has given yet another verbal dressing-down to his Chancellor, the third such in 3 days. While the Kaiser is unaware that his subordinates are ignoring his wishes, he is very much aware that Bethmann is bungling the diplomatic side of the crisis since the ultimatum was issued. Having once again endured the wrath of the “All-highest Warlord”, an emotionally shattered Bethmann – he is described as having “completely collapsed” –  begins frantically cabling Vienna that evening to try and get his ally to reverse course and halt mobilization.

German Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg
Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg
In Vienna a bemused Berchtold, having received more messages from Jagow and Moltke urging him to stay the course, is left to wonder “Who rules in Berlin – Bethmann or Moltke?” The Foreign Secretary figuratively shrugs his shoulders and lets mobilization continue unimpeded.

Meanwhile Bethmann makes another horrible blunder. Meeting late that night with the British Ambassador he begins blabbing on Germany’s war plans in the desperate hope of compelling London to stay neutral in the seemingly inevitable conflict. First he tells Ambassador Goschen that Germany “aimed at no territorial acquisitions at the expense of France” should the Germans win, but admits France’s colonies are not so sacrosanct.

Goschen then asks whether German will respect Dutch and Belgian neutrality. Fully aware that Moltke’s war plan calls for violating Belgian neutrality to get around the French army’s flank, Bethmann can only promise to leave the Netherlands alone. Instead he blurts out that if Belgium does not align against Germany then her “integrity would be respected after the conclusion of the war.” Goschen, fully alarmed by what appears to be Germany’s plan to invade Belgium – a country it, Britain and the other Great Powers are pledged by treaty to protect – promptly informs London of the interview.

St. Petersburg – “The real cause of Austrian intransigence”

Bethmann’s muddled efforts create the most harm with regard to Foreign Minister Sazanov and his colleagues. At 11:00 AM the German Ambassador, Count Pourtales calls on Sazanov to follow up on the Kaiser’s mediation offer: the telegram to his cousin “Nicky” that the Tsar will only receive later that day. He asks Russia to make things easier for the Kaiser by not launching a “premature mobilization” against Austria-Hungary; Sazanov, in turn, asks that the Austrians cease mobilizing its armies against Serbia. After Pourtales leaves, a highly skeptical Sazanov then asks his colleagues whether the German offer is sincere or merely a delaying tactic to give Vienna a head start on its offensive.

Sergei Sazanov, Russian Foreign Minister in 1914.
Sergey Sazanov
Late that afternoon Pourtales receives an additional message from Bethmann: vaguely threaten Russia that Germany will be “compelled” to mobilize if Russia continues to do the same, regardless of whether Austria-Hungary stands down. By this point the Russians are aware of the Austrian bombardment of Belgrade. Such a 180-degree turn from Pourtales from his position earlier that day is the last straw for Sazanov. The meeting promptly gets ugly.
 
Sazanov: I no longer have any doubt as to the real cause of Austrian intransigence
Pourtales: I protest with all my power, Mr. Minister, against this injurious assertion.
Sazanov: Your government still has an opportunity for proving the erroneousness of what I have said.
An angry Pourtales promptly walks out of Sazanov’s office. Plans for full Russian mobilization against both Germany and Austria-Hungary are now prepared to be given. The drama in St. Petersburg that night is only beginning, however.

Willy/Nicky, Part 2: or, the Tsar and his telephone

About 2 hours later, at 8PM, Tsar Nicholas II calls Sazanov on the telephone to inform him of the telegram from “Willy” the night before. As noted yesterday, the Kaiser’s request for mediation to Vienna had been delayed by 2 hours due to his discomfort with using this relatively new-fangled technology; whether Nicholas, unlike Wilhelm was simply more comfortable with the idea of using a telephone, or felt forced to use it by the gravity of the situation, is unclear.

Tsar Nicholas II
Informed by his minister of the German ambassador’s threat, a genuinely perplexed Nicholas dispatches the following telegram to the Kaiser at 8:20 PM:
 
Thanks for your telegram conciliatory and friendly [ie the mediation offer]. Whereas official message presented today by your ambassador to my minister was conveyed in a very different tone. Beg you to explain this divergency! It would be right to give over the Austro-Servian  problem to the Hague Conference. Trust in your wisdom and friendship.

Your loving Nicky
[Note: In 1914 the more frequently used spelling for Serbia substituted a “V” for a “B”. It was not until later in the 20th century that the “b” in Serbia began being commonly used.]

The “Hague Conference” (hosted in the Dutch city of The Hague), a forerunner to both the League of Nations and the United Nations, had been established in 1899 to arbitrate international disputes. It had been the Tsar’s brainchild and had successfully resolved a few colonial disputes prior to 1914. (Today it is the home of the International Criminal Court.) As such the Tsar sincerely believed it could be used to mediate between Serbia and Austria-Hungary. The problem was that the parties involved would have to be willing to resort to The Hague in the first place.

During the same phone call, Sazanov gets the Tsar’s permission to discuss full mobilization with War Minister Sukhonlinov and the Russian army’s Chief of Staff, General Yanushkevitch. None of these 3 men are in doubt as to what ought to be done. At 9:00 PM the Tsar was asked permission to order full mobilization; lacking any peaceful alternative at that moment, he consents. General Dobrorolskii, head of the Russian army’s Mobilization Division heads over to the Central Telegraph Office to have the notices typed up. Once completed all other telegram transmissions will be temporarily suspended in order to get the mobilization telegrams dispatched as quickly as possible to all army units.

Then, at 9:40 PM, the Tsar receives a new telegram from the Kaiser. In it “Willy” tells “Nicky” the following:

I received your telegram and share your wish that peace should be maintained. But as I told you in my first telegram, I cannot consider Austria's action against Servia an "ignoble" war…This my reasoning is borne out by the statement of the Austrian cabinet that Austria does not want to make any territorial conquests at the expense of Servia. I therefore suggest that it would be quite possible for Russia to remain a spectator of the austro-servian conflict without involving Europe in the most horrible war she ever witnessed. I think a direct understanding between your Government and Vienna possible and desirable, and as I already telegraphed to you, my Government is continuing its exercises to promote it. Of course military measures on the part of Russia would be looked upon by Austria as a calamity we both wish to avoid and jeopardize my position as mediator which I readily accepted on your appeal to my friendship and my help.

Willy
[All spelling and grammar are from original]

"Nicky" and "Willy" prior to 1914
The Kaiser’s telegram is in response to the Tsar’s the evening before, not the one dispatched an hour before. Wilhelm will not receive the 8:20 PM telegram (with The Hague proposal) until the next day; Nicholas, unaware of how telegram technology works in 1914, mistakenly believes that Wilhelm’s mediation offer – should Russia not mobilize – is in response to what he had just sent. The Tsar, suddenly motivated by this last-minute chance for peace, immediately summons an aide and tells him, “Everything must be done to save the peace. I will not become responsible for such a monstrous slaughter!”

The Tsar promptly telephones War Minister Sukhomlinov and demands the order for mobilization be canceled. A horrified Sukhomlinov tells Nicholas that “Mobilization is not a mechanical process which one can arrange at will, as one can a wagon, and then set in motion again.” Nicholas gets the same response from Chief of Staff Yanushkevitch. Normally that would be enough to convince the normally passive Tsar to accede to his ministers. Not this time: Nicholas stuck to his guns and demanded the order be canceled. Sukhomlinov and Yanushkevitch now have to choose between submitting, or committing treason by directly defying their master’s order.

Vladimir Sukhomlinov, Russian Minister of War in 1914.
War Minister Vladimir Sukhomlinov
Shortly before 10:00 PM, General Dobrorolskii, still waiting at the Central Telegram Office for the clerks to type up and transmit the decree for full mobilization, is summoned to the telephone to speak to Yanushkevitch. The Chief of Staff tells him to call off the operation per Nicholas’ order. One can imagine a few uncomplimentary words were said about the Tsar and Autocrat of All the Russias during that call but no record of it survives.

Nicholas II had stopped a European war from commencing. The tragedy is that, thanks to events that had already unfolded and those continuing to develop, he has only done so for a single day.

Paris – “Here was a united France.”

The morning of the 29th sees President Raymond Poincare and Prime Minister Rene Viviani finally disembark from their sea voyage from St. Petersburg to Dunkirk. Much has happened during their 6-day trip, including their government’s decision in their absence to mobilize the 100,000 French troops in Algeria and Morocco. Even the hawkish Poincare is shocked by this abrupt move towards war, something neither he nor Viviani was aware of thanks to problems receiving telegrams aboard their ship. The 2 men are quickly brought up to speed on France’s preparations. Viviani orders the French Ambassador to Britain to support Sazanov’s call for the British to restrain Austria from mobilization. How Viviani expects London to do this is left unexplained.

Prime Minister Viviani. He had virtually no foreign policy experience prior to his appointment in May 1914.
In Paris, where only yesterday there had been riots in the aftermath of Madame Caillaux’s shocking acquittal at her trial for murder, the threat of war with Germany is causing a “rally ‘round the flag” effect. As Poincares recalls:
As I came out of the station I was greeted by an overwhelming demonstration which moved me to the depths of my being. Many people had tears in their eyes and I could hardly hold back my own. From thousands of throats arose repeated shouts of: Vive la France et Vive la Republique! Vive le President!...From the station to the Elysee [the President’s mansion] the cheering never stopped…Here was a united France.
Raymond Poincare, President of France from 1913-1920.
President Poincare
Whether or not Poincare’s recollection is accurate, the fact is that the normally acrimonious political disputes in France seemingly vanished overnight in the face of the looming conflict. Only a few public figures – the great antiwar Socialist Jean Jaures among them – refused to join in the call to unify. A “sacred union” was in the offing.

London – “Not a British life shall be sacrificed”

Even as Sir Edward Grey continues to achieve a diplomatic solution with increasingly feeble results, the British cabinet and its public are now fully engaged with the prospect of entering a European war. For the most part they want nothing to do with a conflict stemming from a dispute in faraway Serbia of no interest to Britain and its empire. The Daily News asserts: “The most effective work for peace that we can do is to make clear that not a British life shall be sacrificed for the sake of Russian hegemony of the Slav world.” The Labour Party, then the 3rd -largest in Parliament, considers calling for a general strike if the government enters the war. Most members of the governing Liberal Party – including most of the British Cabinet – share a similar distaste for intervention, reflecting the “Little England” platform of its voting base.

The Cabinet members to support possible intervention on July 29th are but 3 out of 20 in total: Grey, Prime Minister Asquith and First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill. Churchill attempts that day to persuade the popular Chancellor of the Exchequer, David Lloyd George to join the interventionist side but in vain. (Lloyd George’s post is the British equivalent of the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.) Despite this anti-interventionist sentiment, and without informing the Cabinet, Grey tells the German ambassador for the first time that “the British government would be forced into taking rapid decisions” in the event of a European war. “In this case it would not do [for Britain] to stand aside and wait.” This strongly implies that Britain will not stay neutral as Bethmann and his colleagues in Berlin had hoped, and contributes to the German Chancellor’s emotional breakdown that evening.

Sir Edward Grey, British Foreign Secretary, 1905-1916.
Sir Edward Grey
Prince Karl Max von Lichnowsky, Germany Ambassador to Great Britain in 1914.
Ambassador Karl von Lichnowsky
Whether Grey can back up his threat is highly uncertain on July 29th. In light of Liberal Party opposition, Churchill secretly contacts the opposition Conservative Party about forming a united coalition of Tories and Liberals to avoid Britain backing out of the war. The Conservative leader agrees to consider it.

PostScript: Brussels

On the same day that Bethmann accidentally spills the beans on the planned German invasion of Belgium, the Belgian government becomes sufficiently alarmed at the unfolding crisis to recall all officials at once. One minister vacationing in Germany finds the train lines so packed with civilians fleeing for home, while there is still time, that only a friendly lift from a Belgian industrialist gets him back to Brussels the next day.

The fate of Belgium will become increasingly important to our story as the crisis reaches its conclusion.

Originally posted to stephenyellin on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM PDT.

Also republished by History for Kossacks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Let me know what YOU think (8+ / 0-)

    I appreciate everyone who's commented and given me feedback on my coverage to date. I'm glad so many of you have enjoyed my articles and hope you'll continue to do so!

    "We are the leaders we've been waiting for." - Paul Wellstone

    by MrLiberal on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 10:58:33 AM PDT

  •  So-called "responsible" people wanted war (9+ / 0-)

    and that's what they ended up with.  Lots of it.  I don't see what Russia was supposed to do once Germany threatened mobilization.  Again, it all comes back to the blank check issued by the Kaiser.

    One can get revisionist all one wants, but the fact is that Germany could have held Austria's lease but didn't.

    BTW, the real problem for Germany would be that they did not expect Belgium to resist, nor did they think Britain would come into war over a violation of Belgian neutrality -- big mistake that, as Britain had always (or at least very often) intervened historically whenever a great power threatened to take over the Low Countries.

    You have exactly 10 seconds to change that look of disgusting pity into one of enormous respect!

    by Cartoon Peril on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 11:16:00 AM PDT

    •  Exactly (7+ / 0-)

      It's not that I hold Russia/Serbia/France completely free of blame but there's a different between action and reaction. Since there's no evidence linking the plot to kill Franz Ferdinand to the Serbian government, let alone Russia or France, then the primarily blame remains with Austria-Hungary for wanting war and Germany for giving them the green light to wage it.

      You're also correct re: Belgian resistance, although from the German perspective it must have been surprising. Why would the Belgian government be willing to have their country destroyed against an army easily capable of overwhelming theirs with sheer size alone? This purely military way of looking at it ignores the political and legal implications of violating Belgian sovereignty - "might makes right", 1914 style.

      "We are the leaders we've been waiting for." - Paul Wellstone

      by MrLiberal on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 11:46:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Russia Was Already Mobilizing (0+ / 0-)

      Russia had threatened mobilization almost simultaneously with the Germans or even before and ultimately did mobilize before the Germans.  The Russian decision to go to war had very little to do with the German activities with its ally Austria.  And Austria had very good grounds for going to war with Serbia, which had already committed an act of war against the Austrian crown.

      Germany's biggest failing was in opting for a military plan which focused on France first rather than Russia.  That committed Germany to trying to maneuver around the Riviere Line of defenses in eastern France by going through Belgium, the classic invasion route.  If Germany had not invaded Belgium but had opted to allow the French military to kill all of the Frenchmen it could by attacking its fortified zones while throwing itself against Russia, Britain would have dithered as badly as the Italians in deciding whether to enter the war or not.  In the meantime, the German tactical and operational superiority would have sliced and diced the Russians so that revolution would have occurred in 1915 and not 1917.  Take Britain out of the war, with no blockade impeding German industry, and the world sees a Central Powers victory by 1916.

      "Love the Truth, defend the Truth, speak the Truth, and hear the Truth" - Jan Hus, d.1415 CE

      by PrahaPartizan on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 10:07:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I am reading every post your doing... Keep up (7+ / 0-)

    the good research and reporting.  

    It is very informative about the back drop behind the curtains they pulled around themselves.

    "Death is the winner in any war." - Nightwish/Imaginareum/Song of myself.

    by doingbusinessas on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 12:19:45 PM PDT

  •  Thank you for this series (6+ / 0-)

    It's fascinating to follow along in "real time."

    "The NRA says 'guns don't kill people, people do.' But I think that the gun helps." -- Eddie Izzard

    by babaloo on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 12:34:59 PM PDT

  •  Today in the British Parliament - 29 July 1914 (4+ / 0-)

    The House of Commons continued with routine business. The European crisis was only briefly mentioned.

    Austria-Hungary and Servia.

    HC Deb 29 July 1914 vol 65 cc1323-4 1323
    §Mr. JOYNSON-HICKS I beg to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer a question, of which I have given him private notice, 1324 namely: Whether he has communicated with the Bank of England with the view to their convening a meeting of bankers to take steps to deal with the present financial position; and, if not, whether he will consider the advisability of so doing without further delay?
    §Mr. LLOYD GEORGE I have been in consultation with the Bank of England, and I am advised that there is nothing in the financial situation at the present moment which would make such a suggestion necessary or advisable.
    §Mr. BONAR LAW May I ask the Prime Minister whether he has any information in regard to the European situation to give to the House?
    §The PRIME MINISTER As the House is aware, a formal Declaration of War was issued yesterday by Austria against Servia. The situation at this moment is one of extreme gravity. I can only say, usefully say, that His Majesty's Government are not relaxing their efforts to do everything in their power to circumscribe the area of possible conflict.
    §Mr. WALTER GUINNESS May I ask the right hon. Gentleman whether he has received any information as to the alleged revolutionary outbreak in Russian Poland?
    §The PRIME MINISTER No, Sir.

    A new factor, not previously raised in the House, is the financial issue. Chancellor Lloyd George played it down, but the financial interests of the City of London are alarmed by the prospect of war.

    Mr Joynson-Hicks, the Conservative MP for the Brentford division of Middlesex, is a solicitor with a reputation as a practical man of business. I am sure he would not have raised the financial issue if he did not know very well that there was a problem brewing.

    The Conservative leader, Mr Bonar Law, then asked his customary question to find out what the government was prepared to reveal publicly. The Prime Minister revealed nothing that was not common knowledge.

    What Mr Walter Guinness, a young scion of the famous Dublin brewing family, was on about I have no idea. Having served as a Captain in the South African War, perhaps Mr Guinness is wondering if he will have other opportunities for military service if a Great War comes upon us. He is the Conservative MP for the Bury St Edmunds division of Suffolk.

    There is no man alive who is sufficiently good to rule the life of the man next door to him. Sir Rhys Hopkin Morris, M.P.

    by Gary J on Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 02:07:01 PM PDT

  •  how sadly tragic (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MrLiberal, Linda1961

    A few warmongers got their way in spite of their monarchs and millions ended up dead.

    Well written.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site