It's not a mega-circulation paper and not quite as scathing as the anti-endorsement of Trump by USA Today. And its endorsement of Hillary is a little grudging. But they’ve never endorsed a Democrat before in 148 years.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/…
Among other things they describe Trump as “vengeful, dishonest and impulsive."
On Hillary:
But despite Trump’s insistence otherwise, she has the better temperament to be president — and the experience, background and relationships with world leaders that we need in a president.
As secretary of state, she traveled nearly a million miles and visited a record 112 countries. As a U.S. senator, the Democrat showed she can collaborate with Republicans, using what Roll Call labeled an “incremental approach” that “could help restore a working relationship between the White House and Capitol Hill that has been in tatters” for years. As first lady, she expanded health coverage to millions of lower-income children after her husband’s administration lost the battle over universal health care and Democrats lost the Senate and the House.
And the close:
This paper has not endorsed a Democrat for president in its 148-year history. But we endorse Clinton. She’s the safe choice for the U.S. and for the world, for Democrats and Republicans alike.