Per Raw Story's outstanding and timely news website, curiously, questionable government behavior related to 9/11 is in the news again this week, following the public rebuke of the FBI on unheeded 9/11 intelligence and action reports.
The new 9/11 news: the twin towers' collapse on 9/11 was a controlled demolition and Bush's story was "bogus," says former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds.
This guy should be a witness for the DNC Dem hearings on Downing Street Memo, albeit he is somewhat unrelated, his testimony would be stunning..
Anyone: please pass this to the appropriate Dem politicians. I will try to get through to some myself...the more the merry.
This Sensenbrenner BS is actually perfect; it will drum up at least a shred of more interest, especially if a former Bush official calling his former boss a traitor and a dangerous criminal that needs to be frog-marched out of the White House testifies.
Now you know what they are hiding maybe...
UPI article below:
UPI Hears...
By John Daly
UPI International Correspondent
Washington, DC, Jun. 13 (UPI) -- Insider notes from United Press International for June 8
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."